[Vision2020] Donovan: Liar, Idiot, or both?

[Sunil Ramalingam]

Donovan,

First, you are a liar.  You lie that you only attack those who attack you.  
You launched this recent character assassination, now joined by Dick 
Sherwin, after I asked you a simple question.

You lie about my opinions and statements.  Here, picked at random from the 
list of links you provided, is one of my posts:

'Dick,

Is torture illegal?  Is the President allowed to permit torture?  Are he or
those who torture in our name immune from prosecution?

Sunil'

Please explain, if you can, how this is support of terrorists or enemies of 
the United States.  Of course you may be busy lobbying the Senate to support 
the Administration's bill to set up kangaroo courts and permit evidence 
obtaied by torture right now.  Quick, attack Colin Powell too for opposing 
torture and the violation of the Geneva Conventions.  Even he can't stay on 
board with this stuff any longer.

Dick, your statements simply show you cannot understand the idea that we 
have the right and duty to stand up for what we believe, and that people who 
love this country and its principles do not necessarily agree with you.  The 
road to a totalitarian state will be paved by people who don't understand 
the need for honest dialog and criticism of government.

Donovan, I can see how your maturity and breadth of life experience 
qualifies you to give career advice.  I shall give it all the attention it 
deserves.  For my part, I wouldn't put you in charge of cleaning catboxes or 
diapers, work for which you seemed qualified earlier.  You would eat the 
shit and then spew it on this listserve as you have been doing.

When you are no longer a fool, it will show in your posts.  When you can 
attack my ideas by analysing what I've actually said, I'll be surprised.  
It's easier for you to lie and proclaim your idiocy than it is to actually 
do any work.

Prove your points or shut up, windbag.

Sunil


>From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
>To: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Sunil and His Defense of Terrorists and 
>ConvictedChild Molesters
>Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Sunil,
>
>  I don't disagree with defending the rights of the  accused. I disagree 
>with giving any rights at all to convicted and self  admitted child 
>molesters over the rights of others. If someone is  accused of child 
>molestation, they should get the best defense  possible. But after that, 
>shy of a mistrial or rigged trail, lawyers  shouldn't be arguing, in court 
>or on-line that they should be free to  go to another city, unsupervised, 
>that is FUBAR. To me, that is  supporting Child Molesters over the rights 
>of children and other  potential victims. I don't care your logic, that 
>self admitted and  convicted child molesters should have those rights. 
>PERIOD.
>
>   Second, I would never support putting you in charge of the nation's  
>security.  I listed plenty of emails that indicate your position  on 
>terrorists. It is my opinion, Sunil, that the tone and language of  your 
>emails combined, over time,  indicate you sympathize with the  plight of 
>the majority of these individuals that wish real harm to  Americans and 
>Westerns. Others are entitled to look at those 20+ emails  over the last 3 
>years and think otherwise. It is my opinion that any  foreigner that states 
>they wish real harm to the United States, its  elected leaders, its people, 
>or its property, and has the ability to  act on that statement, the 
>military has the duty to detain that  foreigner until her/she is no longer 
>poses a threat. It is called  National Security. National Security and the 
>prevention of an immediate  harm and death of the innocent take precedence 
>over that of individual  freedom of movement of US enemies.
>
>  Nobody is putting a gun  to your head to represent convicted and 
>self-admitted child molesters.  That is your choice, and yours only. Nobody 
>is forcing you to  sympathize with the rights of people who say "Death to 
>America". You  could choose to represent the elderly, disabled, or millions 
>of other  poor children that are wronged everyday in this country with no  
>shortage of work and just as little pay.
>
>   You spend  way to much time on Vision2020 defending these people.
>
>   But again, I am not going to argue with you. As you could argue the  
>number of the dimples on a golf ball only number two, that is what you  do. 
>I am not good at legal argumentation, I cannot even spell half the  time. 
>But I can tell you my opinion is that convicted child molesters  should not 
>go anywhere unsupervised and that terrorists wish harm and  can will bring 
>harm to the US should be set free because of some legal  argument, tell 
>that to victims of 911. Your statements, so frequently  and intensely, as 
>you do on a public forum, in my opinion, is defending  them, not their 
>actions, but them.
>
>   Best,
>
>   _DJA