[Vision2020] Duncan plea deal

[Tom Hansen]

I am divided on this issue.  If there ever was garbage that qualified for
the death penalty, Duncan would fit its definition to a "T".  

However, if it is decided that Duncan's life should be spared, I do not feel
that it would be incumbent upon the tax payers to provide safe seclusion for
Duncan from the prison's general population.

In my mind those are the only viable alternatives when dealing with scum
like Duncan.

Thoughts?

Tom Hansen
Vandalville, Idaho

 "Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them
up, at least a little bit."

- Edward R. Murrow

-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of keely emerinemix
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:52 PM
To: joekc at adelphia.net
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Duncan plea deal

I share a lot of your thoughts on this, Joe.  I can't say that I would mourn

the death of Joseph Duncan, even as I would regret the legal mechanism by 
which his life was taken.

keely


From: Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net>
To: keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Duncan plea deal
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:16:11 -0700

This is a very tricky issue, Keely. I share your bias but there is something

about the Duncan case that is especially disturbing. Couple it with two 
other recent cases b