[Vision2020] [Vision2020 liberals, courts, and Tony (was Pledge)

[Tony]

Sunil, you seem to becoming more and more uptight with each message.  Have 
you considered looser fitting briefs?

I did not dutifully peruse the material you sent because I am not in the 
habit of taking homework assignments from those who regularly demonstrate 
the capacity to become unhinged.

As far as the central Park Jogger is concerned, she was obviously attacked 
by a predator.  My reference to the plural was meant in reference to victims 
of violent crime in general.  Further, and this is a point which you seem 
particularly unable to grasp, I am not opposed to the appeals process when 
they are within REASON.  Allow me to repeat:  WITHIN REASON!!  What I have 
consistently opposed is the endless, decades long stalling that takes place 
on behalf of predatory vermin like the Lankfords.

And councilor, if you wish others to accept that my assertions are bogus, 
you most certainly must show EVIDENCE of such, or perhaps, admit defeat.

As for your lack of respect for me, I am unconcerned as my sense of self 
worth is not contingent upon your approval.

Merry Christmas!    -T


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Vision2020 liberals, courts, and Tony (was 
Pledge)


> Tiger,
>
> I have to guess you didn't read either article. You don't have to, but if
> you had, you would see that she was attacked by one person, not predators,
> as you allege.  Innocent people did prison time. That's my point.  If you
> were setting the standards for defense attorneys, no one would be 
> obligated
> to help them.
>
> So you're clear, I don't have a duty to show you how each of your points 
> is
> wrong.  If you want to talk, you can try to substantiate what you're 
> saying.
>
> You substantiate my characterizations of you every time you post, Tiger, 
> you
> self-inflated crusader, and you get every ounce of respect you deserve.
>
> Sunil
>
>
>>From: "Tony" <tonytime at clearwire.net>
>>To: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>>CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Vision2020 liberals, courts, and Tony (was
>>Pledge)
>>Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:17:11 -0800
>>
>>Sunil, it is you who has suggested that I am ignorant.  It is therefore
>>YOUR responsibility to demonstrate how such is the case.  Your failure to
>>directly address my assertions and disprove them or at least attempt to,
>>renders your characterization of me as a fool simply gratuitous.  Your
>>supposed to be so sharp -- surely you can do better than that.
>>
>>My example of the central Park Jogger was spot-on appropriate inasmuch as
>>she was a victim of a mugging at the hands of predators.  That was what 
>>was
>>under reference at that time.  If you would like to apply YOUR specific
>>reference and then regard MY example as inappropriate, you are of course
>>free to do so, but do not expect to be applauded for your intellect when
>>you engage in such faulty reasoning.
>>
>>I never ask you for respect.  I do not pine for, nor do I require your
>>respect.  I earn respect when I care for and nurture my 3 children, when I
>>assist and show respect to the elderly, etc.  I would not seek the type of
>>respect one would garner by groveling at the feet of some self-important
>>crusader.
>>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>