[Vision2020] Tony Simpsom Shills for Terrorists Yet Again!

[Matt Decker]

Sure the same reason you can explain they would have surrendered. I would 
love to carry this conversation on. If you can't realize what we "did" saved 
lives, then I won't though.

Matt


>From: "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>
>To: "Matt Decker" <mattd2107 at hotmail.com>
>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tony Simpsom Shills for Terrorists Yet Again!
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:41:04 -0800
>
>On 11/14/06, Matt Decker <mattd2107 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Nope!
>
>Matt --
>
>Then please explain why a starving, broken Japan, without oil,
>shipping, air power, or a workable navy --- a Japan that was prepared
>to surrender, so long as we granted conditions which we, in the final
>instrument of surrender, /did/ end up granting -- warranted dropping
>not one, but /two/ atomic bombs, against the better judgement of every
>major general and admiral engaged in the Pacific war?
>
>-- ACS
>
>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from 
Microsoft Office Live 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/