Fw: [Vision2020] To Chew On

[rvrcowboy]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rvrcowboy" <rvrcowboy at clearwire.net>
To: "Chasuk" <chasuk at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] To Chew On


> Chasuk, on 5/16:  "As usual, you bring up a collection of ancient texts
that
> has no relevance in my life, while ignoring modern, topical research."
>
> Dear ChasSuck,
>
> Look, dummy... to start with, I wasn't even directing this to you.  Of
> course none of this is relevent to you, you are a pagan.  And as for your
> "modern topical research", who cares?  There are a number of people here
who
> claim to be Christian and also homosexual.  I don't disagree with them
that
> this is possible, in fact, I am happy they do accept Christ in their
lives.
>
> My point, directed at those people, is:  "How do you justify homosexuality
> and not those other sins?"  BIBLICALY!!!  You, of course, would have no
> frame of reference in this topic what-so-ever.  Your only purpose appears
to
> be kissing up to Joan, as usual.  Joan is a big girl and can fight her own
> battles without your feeble help.
>
> I am not the least bit interested in your assinine responses to this
> question because you are not one of those to whom my question is even
> directed ... Get it?  Or are you too stupid to understand?
>
> Dick S.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chasuk" <chasuk at gmail.com>
> To: "rvrcowboy" <rvrcowboy at clearwire.net>; "Vision2020"
> <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] To Chew On
>
>
> > On 5/16/06, rvrcowboy <rvrcowboy at clearwire.net> wrote:
> >
> > > As usual, you missed the whole point of my questioning.  I was not
> refering
> > > to whether the homosexual community and the bestiality and incestious
> > > communities had anything in common other than they are all mentioned
in
> the
> > > Bible as being sins in nearly the same places and under the same
> > > circumstances.  The question, therefore, was how do you justify one as
> > > "normal" and not the others.
> >
> > > It had nothing to do with the research you have undertaken.  Sorry you
> had
> > > to waste your time but as usual, you were off the mark.
> >
> > The point is, Dick, that I don't have to justify consensual behavior
> > between two (or even more) adults.  As usual, you missed the mark.
> >
> > As usual, you bring up a collection of ancient texts that has no
> > relevance in my life, while ignoring modern, topical research.
> >
>