[Vision2020] Why Go After Them?

[rvrcowboy]

My argument was that many of the same arguments used to justify same sex
marriage are also the same arguments people use to justify bestiality,
incest and sex with minor children.  So what makes them different?  Some
here have indicated they are appaled with those things but use the same
arguments to justify their position on homosexuality.

I believe there is a common thread running through all these issues.  Why
should anyone be tolerant of one of these issues but not tolerant of the
others?  What makes them different?  That is my point, nothing more, nothing
less.

Dick
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chasuk" <chasuk at gmail.com>
To: "rvrcowboy" <rvrcowboy at clearwire.net>
Cc: "Vision2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Vision2020] Why Go After Them?


> On 5/11/06, rvrcowboy <rvrcowboy at clearwire.net> wrote:
>
> > Most of the arguments promoting the legalization of gay marriage appear
to
> > me to be the very same arguments that would promote beastiality,
incestial
> > marriage and legalization of sex with children.
>
> It is "bestiality," not beastiality, and "incestuous," not incestial.
> Further, you asked about incest, not about "incestial (sic)
> marriage."
>
> So, sex between consenting adults seems to you to be the same as sex
> with animals, sex with kin, and sex with children?
>
> I feel sorry for your dog, your grandmother, and your
children/grandchildren.
>