[Vision2020] Wilson makes Somebody furious!--Wilson killed Santa

[Michael]

DJA,

 

I think that there would be a lot less discussion about Sitler if you were
not continuing this debate with multiple people; your interest here seems to
be your political agenda and your desire to defend Wilson. Concern about the
victims does not seem to interest you here.  No matter the issue or how
robust the evidence, Wilson is innocent and his critics are immoral, no
matter who they are (as my biography illustrates):   "And apparently, you
will stop at nothing, even when it comes to the most tragic events like this
one."  One important guideline for me in this is to encourage folks not to
talk about the victims at all and use them for their own argumentative
purposes-there is no reason they need to be brought up at all.  I therefore
request that you would stop bringing up the victims, which is nothing but
continuing Wilson's unfortunate rhetorical defense.  In your effort to
reveal hypocrisy of Tom Hansen, and long term ax you have to grind, you have
in reality tried to "politically capitalize on the actions of a pedophile."
Perhaps you all have kicked a dead horse here enough.  Unfortunately,
Wilson's unnecessary and aggressive response to a mere public announcement,
his slanderous reviling of anyone who had anything to do with it (including
his implicit slander of the victims themselves), and his revealing of
private information about the victims in order to defend himself has caused
a simple public announcement to launch into a full controversy.  I really
doubt Wilson needed the critical reflection of Tom Hansen to succeed at
doing this.  

 

Thank you

Michael

 

 

Tom,

You need to go back and reread my previous post.

There was a Head of Household meeting in which this issue was discussed. Do
you understand that Hansen? Do you understand that the members of Christ
Church were informed. The public was informed through government channels,
mainly, the police. So stop saying they were not, it is a lie.

Second, when I said if he said something publicly it would interfere with
the case, I  was referring to BEFORE official charges were made, not after
the conviction. You were the one that was making a case about Wilson not
releasing information that any citizen could have obtained at any time from
the court house.

Thirdly, I find your attempts to try and exploit and politically capitalize
on the actions of a pedophile saddening.

If your true concerns were for victim's of sexual predators, and not
something to try and use as a weapon on a political opponent, you would have
been listing all of the sexual predators in our community and surrounding
areas, not just ONE that no longer lives here. Your pretend concern for the
community regarding this issue, is laughable. You are only interested in one
thing, advancing your political agenda and attacking Doug Wilson, you will
stop at nothing, even when it comes to the most tragic of events like this
one and at the behest of the victim's family to stop. 

Regards,

_DJA

Tom Hansen <idahotom at hotmail.com> wrote: 

Arnold - 
 
You really ought to go back and re-read your post.
 
You claimed that any public announcement concerning Sitler would adversely
impact a locally ongoing investigation.
 
Sitler made a plea agreement.  In exchange for his plea of guilty, Sitler
was to receive a lighter sentence.
 
Once all was said and done concerning Sitler's plea agreement, he became a
convicted pedophile.  Now, tell us how making such an announcement public
would hinder an ongoing investigation, an investigation that would pretty
much be moot due to Sitler's conviction (BACK IN JULY of 2005).
 
Concerning if/when Wilson was aware of certain facts . . . STAY TUNED . . .
more forthcoming.
 
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060618/bbc4a2aa/attachment-0001.htm