[Vision2020] light pollution
Steven Basoa
sbasoa at moscow.com
Sun Jan 22 10:45:48 PST 2006
Mr. Harkins,
Please do your homework about neighbors before you post.
It's wonderful that you, as a rural property owner, "respect the
concept of light pollution and manage my light use to be as
unobtrusive as possible." It is to be applauded that you and your
neighbors are able to work out problems such as light pollution. I,
too, am a rural property owner and have enjoyed good working
relations with my neighbors.
However, some neighbors simply don't give a crap. They do what they
do and don't consider anything but their own amusements. If their
night lights are pointed directly into your living room, it's your
problem, not theirs ('put up heavier curtains' they might say). Some
neighbors will be understanding and listen to reason. Others will go
out and increase the wattage. It's a crapshoot. You and I, we're
lucky to have good neighbors. Many others are not so fortunate. And
with the current trend of building a house on top of every hill in
the county, light pollution is bound to get worse.
I support the draft ordinance requiring shielded lights. This shows
consideration for neighbors and still allows excellent visibility for
property owners. I fail to see how this requirement will cause more
"damage and injury to property and persons" or cause more "damages to
animals and crops harmed by predators and foragers". My unshielded
lights (granted, they are not high wattage mercury vapor lights) do
not keep the deer and moose away nor do they stop the coyotes from
their nightly prowls. As to "damages resulting from burglary,
trespass and general mischief", well, shielded or not, lights alone
will not deter a determined burglar or general mischief-maker.
I take great pleasure in viewing the night sky, unobstructed from
most neighbors lights. I am very fortunate in that regard and wish
to remain so. This proposed ordinance is a positive step towards
preserving one aspect of this wonderful quality of life we currently
enjoy here in Latah County while causing few, if any, real problems.
-Steven
On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:46 PM, Jeff Harkins wrote:
Mr. Evans,
Please do your homework about the physics of light before you post.
For the rest of you interested in this topic, consider that with a
bit over 1000 square miles of land in Latah County, there are 500
rural farm lights (yard lights). That is 1 light per 2 square
miles. Since many of the lights are clustered in areas around the
urban centers, the average number of light units per square mile
drops considerably. It is dark in the rural parts of this county.
As a rural property owner, let me assure you that I do respect the
concept of light pollution and manage my light use to be as
unobtrusive as possible. All of us in our "neighborhood" work
together to not impose on each other on most issues, including
lighting. If there was a problem, we would find a way to work it
out. I don't recognize your name and I am rather confident that you
don't live near me. So why, exactly, are you attempting to dictate
lighting issues to me and my neighbors.
If you, Mr. Evans, would be willing to demand that the County accept
all liability for damage and injury to property and persons that
result from reduced lighting on rural property, would support a fair
compensation to me (or my neighbors) for damages to animals and crops
harmed by predators and foragers, would support public funds be
raised to reimburse me (or rural residents) for damages resulting
from burglary, trespass and general mischief, we can pursue a
dialogue. Frankly, I would rather invest such scarce public dollars
in county infrastructure and schools ....
Until then, I will not compromise my responsibility for the health
and safety of my family, my neighbors or my friends for your dark sky
agenda.
Until you support full financial responsibility by Latah County for
the consequences for what you are asking me and my neighbors to do in
our neighborhood, why don't you work with your neighbors to deal with
the light pollution in your neighborhood? I assume that you live in
Moscow.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060122/a09122a8/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list