[Vision2020] Drafting Survey Questions for Nancy

[Phil Nisbet]

Bill

As a complete idea, why not have a charge on developments to fund a Parks 
fund that would do both purchase and O & M costs.  Allow those who opt for 
planned unit development to opt out of the Parks fee.  Allow not just parks 
to be included as portions of the Planned unit development, allow riparian 
and wetlands options.  Add a further bonus of some sort for any and all 
developments that preserve native prarie.  Frabkly we cold even set up an 
option for offiste in such developments if prarie conservation areas of 
critical importance can be identified.

Just a few more thoughts.

Phil Nisbet


>From: "Bill London" <london at moscow.com>
>To: "Phil Nisbet" <pcnisbet1 at hotmail.com>
>CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Drafting Survey Questions for Nancy
>Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:54:58 -0800
>
>P-
>I am supportive of clustered housing options that bundle homes together and
>preserve open space on a single parcel.  I understand a model development 
>of
>that sort is planned for the 10 acres between Lola Clyde Park and PCEI on
>Rodeo Drive by North Polk St.  That is a good way to approach the park 
>issue
>as well.
>BL
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Phil Nisbet" <pcnisbet1 at hotmail.com>
>To: <london at moscow.com>
>Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 2:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Drafting Survey Questions for Nancy
>
>
> > Bill
> >
> > Interesting.
> >
> > What about adding a planned unit development option?  Set it up so that 
>if
> > the developer of a subdivision turns half of rhe lands into a park or
> > natrual area he gains some benefit,  On the other hand, tighten the 
>screws
> > on over development.  The net effect is incentivising good behavior and
> > increasing green space.
> >
> > Another thing would be the lack of any park or natural space in the
> > Apartment areas.
> >
> > Phil Nisbet
> >
> >
> > >From: "Bill London" <london at moscow.com>
> > >To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>, "Nils Peterson" <nilsp at moscow.com>
> > >CC: Nancy Chaney <nchaney at moscow.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Drafting Survey Questions for Nancy
> > >Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:18:48 -0800
> > >
> > >Nils:
> > >regarding your draft survey questions for city use -- yours was an
> > >excellent
> > >idea and example (reprinted below)...
> > >here's mine....
> > >
> > >parkland options
> > >1. neighborhood parks are not important; continue existing policy (city
>has
> > >not developed a park in any of the new Moscow 
>neighborhoods/subdivisions)
> > >2. neighborhood parks are OK; developers should be required to pay some
> > >fees
> > >or dedicate some land to ensure that a portion of the costs of
>establishing
> > >and maintaining a park will be borne by the developers and most of the
> > >costs
> > >will be borne by the city taxpayers (find enough city money to develop
>and
> > >maintain a few parks in new neighborhoods)
> > >3. neighborhood parks are vital; developers must dedicate the parkland
> > >before beginning construction of homes, bear the cost of developing the
> > >park, and establish a fund to maintain that park in the future (ensure
>that
> > >all neighborhoods have parks)
> > >BL
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Nils Peterson" <nilsp at moscow.com>
> > >To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > >Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:26 AM
> > >Subject: [Vision2020] Drafting Survey Questions for Nancy
> > >
> > >
> > > > Murf had an editorial on the weekend that mentioned Nancy Chaney is
> > > > considering mailing a survey to 22,000 residents to ask for input. I
> > > > got to thinking that this group might help her compose those survey
> > > > items. I'm thinking that she needs a few that are concise questions
> > > > and give real substantive direction. After pondering, I came up with
> > > > this one. Editorial revision welcome, other questions also welcome.
> > > >
> > > > How should Moscow policy be shaped relative to water (choose one)
> > > > 1. Water will take care of itself, focus policy elsewhere
> > > > 2. Encouraging voluntary measures; Lead by example to reduce city
> > > > water use
> > > > 3. Raise water rates, especially in the summer, to discourage water
>use
> > > > 4. Place restrictions on development to make it more water frugal
> > > > 5. Limit development of new land to keep in line with City's PBAC
> > > > water budget
> > > >
> > > > _____________________________________________________
> > > >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > >                http://www.fsr.net
> > > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> > > >
> > >
> > >_____________________________________________________
> > >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >                http://www.fsr.net
> > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's 
>FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/