[Vision2020] Water: What is missing - Political actiion

Mark Solomon msolomon at moscow.com
Wed Apr 26 10:13:30 PDT 2006


Chris,

Reaching carrying capacity is scary stuff.

m.

At 9:09 AM -0800 4/26/06, Chris Storhok wrote:
>Mark,
>  What I find interesting is that yesterday seven 
>bills were introduced in Congress that address 
>the same water concerns that Moscow has.  Our 
>nation's over consumptive ways have caught up 
>with us.
>
>Chris
>
>
>From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com 
>[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf 
>Of Mark Solomon
>Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:26 AM
>To: James Reynolds; Art Deco; Vision 2020
>Subject: RE: Re: [Vision2020] Water: What is missing
>
>National average water use for a family of 4 is 
>@ 78 gallons per person per day. Same with 
>customary but not extraordinary conservation 
>measures taken is 54 gallons per person per day. 
>I remember the numbers but not the cite right 
>now.
>
>Wayne hit it on the head: it takes political 
>leadership to address the issue. Aaron Ament, as 
>the Council's representative to PBAC, has taken 
>a very active interest in the issue. I look 
>forward to his leadership at the City level on 
>this issue.
>
>Mark
>
>At 9:16 AM -0700 4/26/06, James Reynolds wrote:
>
>>I believe that we should do whatever necessary 
>>to increase our water supply. When the Palouse 
>>was settled and made into a wheat producing 
>>landscape many small ponds, wetlands and such 
>>were drained off. These drained areas were 
>>perhaps the recharge engines for our upper 
>>aquifer. How about reclaiming some (many) of 
>>these areas for this? Federal, State, maybe 
>>even county technical asistence (maybe some 
>>monetary) would be available to start such a 
>>program and I expect our ever-growing urban 
>>farmer population on their 40 acre tracts would 
>>be interested in having a pond etc..
>>
>>
>>
>>Also I remember hearing about an artesian well 
>>on Doc. Lucas's (Bless him) property south of 
>>moscow. That site and potentially others might 
>>be developed to provide catch/holding basins 
>>(his is in bedrock I think) for water that 
>>might be sold to the city or on a smaller scale 
>>sold to neighbors for irrigation.
>>
>>
>>
>>The problem with the emphasis on conservation 
>>is that it really does impact the quality of 
>>life for many who looked forward to gardening 
>>their home lot and making it a masterpiece of 
>>tranquility. contrary to some on the list, I 
>>see no evil in wanting your grounds to be a 
>>preserve in which to sooth ones soul. I also 
>>don't think we are doing anything about 
>>increasing the water available to keep Moscow 
>>the beautiful green place it is. We haven't 
>>even begun to work on the problem and already 
>>it seems the consensus is to relegate Latah to 
>>a desert environment. That is not what Latah 
>>county is by any measure, we just have not 
>>worked hard enough in making it remain the 
>>paradise that it is.
>>
>>
>>
>>Another thing...is there available a 
>>chart/graph that shows how much water a family 
>>should use to be considered unhoglike? It would 
>>be interesting to know how much water we should 
>>expect to use for the things we do.
>>
>>
>>
>>My toilets work fine and I surely don't want to 
>>mess with something that critical when they are 
>>good now.
>>
>>
>>
>>James 
>>
>>
>>  > From: deco at moscow.com
>>>  To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Water: What is missing
>>>  Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:00:50 -0700
>>>
>>>  Thank you Nils for the comment which is really at the heart of the matter:
>>>
>>>  "If the assertion in #1 [A large enough segment of the Moscow electorate 
>>>  willing to be educated on this issue.  There are many people who believe 
>>>  that the water issue is not that important at this time.] is true, many 
>>>  people don't believe its an issue, then I doubt the rest of the items can 
>>>  follow."
>>>
>>>  Mark Solomon and Bill and Diane French of the Palouse Water Conservation 
>>>  Network (PWCN) have devoted substantial amounts of time and effort 
>>>  attempting to educate us about the aquifer and water 
>>>  usage/replenishment/conservation.
>>  >
>>>  [For example, a recent post by Mark Solomon (reposted below) about the 
>>> 
>>>amount of water usage need to support the proposed Super WalMart should be a 
>>>  real eye opener.]
>>>
>>> 
>>>Although PBAC (Palouse Basin Aquifer Committee) continues important work on 
>>>  the subject, they and their former leader Larry Kirkland, lost a lot of 
>>>  credibility and in my opinion did a great deal of damage to the water 
>>>  conservation effort by Kirkland's endorsement of the Naylor Farms proposal 
>>> 
>>>and by their tepid response to the WSU golf course proposal [and now a plan 
>>>  becoming reality.]
>>>
>>>  Besides the efforts of Solomon and the Frenches, we need political leaders
>>
>>  > who not only talk the game by give cheer-leader type speeches on the 
>>>  subject, but ones who will dig in to come up with, finance, and lead a 
>>>  multi-prong program carefully designed to educate the electorate and to 
>>> 
>>>motivate them enough to be willing to conserve.  This is not a small task as 
>>>  you can see by the responses on this forum.
>>>
>>> 
>>>Mark's water budget concept is an excellent proposal.  It needs courageous, 
>>> 
>>>relentless political support.  That support will be hard to come by without 
>>>  a majority of the electorate willing to make some major changes/sacrifices 
>>> 
>>>both little and big in their water consumption habits.  That's why a lot of 
>>>  education, much of it repetitive but tantalizingly packaged in a number of 
>>>  different, effective ways, needs to be done and done well.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Wayne A. Fox
>>>  1009 Karen Lane
>>>  PO Box 9421
>>>  Moscow, ID  83843
>>>
>>>  (208) 882-7975
>>>  waf at moscow.com
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>__________________________________________________________________________________
>>>  To add another piece to the water thread, there is the issue of how we 
>>>  support growth and development in Moscow when we are at or beyond the 
>>>  ability of our aquifers to supply water to the city.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: the deep Grande Ronde aquifer has no identified recharge mechanism and 
>>>  continues to fall 1-2'/year.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: the upper Wanapum aquifer recharges seasonally (winter runoff) through 
>>>  mechanisms not quite identified (the ongoing Latah County Hydrogeological 
>>>  Characterization Project is designed to answer that question) but the 
>>> 
>>>current rate of withdrawal from the Wanapum exceeds the recharge. Historical 
>>>  pumping records indicate that  Wanapum well levels may drop precipitously 
>>>  within 15 years.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: the City of Moscow is signatory to the regional Palouse Basin Aquifer 
>>>  Agreement which requires each pumping entity (Moscow, Pullman, UI, WSU) to 
>>>  limit increases in pumping to 1% annually and to not exceed a total cap of 
>>>  125% of the total volume pumped as an average of the years 1982-1987 for a 
>>>  cap of 875 million gallons/year (MGY). It was hoped that limiting pumping 
>>>  increases would allow the aquifer levels to stabilize. They were wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: From 1994 to 2003, Moscow exceeded its 1% annual growth limit and from 
>>>  1998-2003 its 875 mgy cap.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: After Moscow area conservation and civic groups filed a petition with 
>>>  the State asking for designation of Moscow area aquifers as Critical 
>>>  Groundwater Management Areas and Groundwater Management Areas the City 
>>> 
>>>implemented mandatory landscape irrigation measures that reduced the amount 
>>>  of water pumped by the City from 919 MGY in 2003 to 819 MGY in 2005. 
>>>  (Bravo!) 2005 was the first year since the city signed the PBAC agreement 
>>>  that it was in compliance with the agreement.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Fact: Moscow City wells (with the exception of Wells 6&8 which have had 
>>>  their pumping significantly decreased due to internal piping issues) 
>>> 
>>>continue to have declining water levels despite the conservation efforts of 
>>>  people and businesses across the city.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Fact: the SuperWalmart developer, on page 6 of his application for a rezone 
>>> 
>>>of the Thompson property across from the cemetery, forecasts full build out 
>>> 
>>>at 1.5 million square foot of commercial space. The applicant predicts water 
>>>  useage based on full build out at over 62 MGY.  Full build out would 
>>>  increase water pumped by 7.6% above current levels violating the 1% annual 
>>  > 
>>increase. Full build out will also cause the City to exceed its absolute cap 
>>>  of 875 mgy.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>Question: Is this how we want to use the water we have conserved? Do we want 
>>>  to give all our water to Walmart?
>>>
>>>
>>>  Answer: The City Council is holding a public hearing on Walmart's proposed 
>>>  rezone 5/1, 7:00 pm , Council Chambers (unless they move it to someplace 
>>>  where all the people who are likely to attend can actually fit in the 
>>>  room...)
>>>
>>>
>>>  Mark Solomon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>  From: "Nils Peterson" <nils_peterson at wsu.edu>
>>>  To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>>  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:13 PM
>>
>>  > Subject: [Vision2020] Water: What is missing
>>>
>>>
>>>  > This is a good list, and some clear challenges. If the assertion in #1 is
>>>  > true, many people don't believe its an issue, then I doubt the rest of the
>>>  > items can follow.
>>>  >
>>>  > Is it possible that many think a declining aquifer might be a problem, but
>>>  > they don't think they can affect a solution, or that a solution might be
>>>  > financially costly to them, or that a solution might have negative impacts
>>>  > on the city (read, no growth).
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > Art Deco writes:
>>>  >> Nils asks:
>>>  >>
>>>  >> "What is missing to put this into action?"
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Among other things that may or may not be missing but whose existence is
>>>  >> vital:
>>>  >>
>>>  >> 1.    A large enough segment of the Moscow electorate willing to be 
>>>  >> educated
>>>  >> on this issue.  There are many people who believe that the water issue is
>>>  >> not that important at this time.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> 2.    Enough informed, willing and able persons to do the one-on-one
>>>  >> education that it would probably take; the funds that it would take to
>>>  >> prepare the materials for and to execute the education program.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> 3.    A majority on the Moscow City Council with enough courage and 
>>>  >> stamina
>>>  >> to lead, to carefully plan, and to enact the program.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> 4.    A competent enough city manager and staff to successfully implement
>>>  >> the program.
>>>  >>
>>>  >> W.
>>>  >
>>>  > _____________________________________________________
>>>  > List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>>  > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>>  >               http://www.fsr.net
>>>  >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>  > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>>  >
>>>  > 
>>>
>>>  _____________________________________________________
>>>   List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>>>   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>>>                 http://www.fsr.net                       
>>>            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>  ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Join the next generation of Hotmail and you 
>>could win the adventure of a lifetime 
>><%20http://www.imagine-msn.com/minisites/sweepstakes/mail/register.aspx>Learn 
>>More.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060426/d43c5dfe/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list