[Vision2020] re:water
Donovan Arnold
donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 24 21:37:32 PDT 2006
I say we continue to pump water from the aquifer. In the year 2306 A.D., when we run out of water, then we can look and see what options we have available for water usage. Who knows, maybe by that year the ice caps will melt and water will cover the entire Earth, which will be good because it is going to get really hot.
If you want to fight this horrible problem put an non-recyclable laminated bumper sticker on the back of your 5 MPG SUV that publicly proclaims your love for Mother Earth and to stop paving it over because the water never gets into the ground.
Take Care,
_DJA
Mark Solomon <msolomon at moscow.com> wrote: Re: [Vision2020] re:water While it hasn't been examined recently, an Army Corps of Engineers study from 1982? (help on the date anyone?) examined the costs and general feasibility of pumping water from the Snake, from Dworshak and from the N. Fk Palouse River to Moscow. All were prohibitively expensive. It's a 2000' lift from the Snake or Dworshak plus the pipeline.
I've been advocating for the last year or more that PBAC members impose a task on themselves to establish individual water budgets based on the best currently available knowledge. Even if all they did was say the amount we're pumping now is the amount we'll set for our budget as "sustainable" (hardly a very defensible premise, but it's a place to start), it would allow each entity to put costs to acquiring new water, be it through conservation or new sources. My guess is all of a sudden water conservation would be an economically viable part of the cities and universities base program, not the add-on it's generally treated as now.
For an example, let's say a developer wanted to build 50 new houses and it was going to take 5 million gallons/yr to supply them with water (that's a real number based on average consumption rates for a household of 4). Low flush toilets use 13,000 gallons/year less than older toilets for a family of four. There are at least several thousand old 5-7 gallon/flush toilets in Moscow houses. The City could have a program where a developer could pay into a toilet replacement fund to cover the cost of replacing enough toilets that his or her development ended up water budget neutral. In this instance, the developer would have to "buy" 384 low-flush toilets to balance the water books. It would be significantly less costly to the developer if the developer installed water saving devices and appliances throughout the house and xeriscaped the yard as well.
Let's make a water budget and stick to it!
Mark Solomon
At 4:00 PM -0700 4/24/06, Tom Ivie wrote:
What about pump stations and irrigation districts? This is done in southern Idaho. They seem to be able to pump out of the Snake up great distances to irrigate what otherwise would be desert land. Could it be done here?
---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060424/6a87a00d/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list