[Vision2020]Getting to draw the lines and pseudonyms

[Tom Hansen]

Visionaires -

 

I have been informed that the statement concerning J's minor son was NOT
made by Arnold, that it was made by "No Clue" Farris.

 

My sincerest apologies to Arnold for my misguided venom.  During the course
of continued banter on V2020 this afternoon, I misinterpreted Farris'
comments as originating from Arnold.

 

Once again, my apologies.

 

Tom Hansen

Moscow, Idaho

 

"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in
sideways, chocolate in one hand, a drink in the other, body thoroughly used
up, totally worn out and screaming 'WOO HOO. What a ride!'"

  _____  

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Tom Hansen
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 5:51 PM
To: 'Donovan Arnold'; 'Joan Opyr'; 'Vision2020 Moscow'
Subject: RE: [Vision2020]Getting to draw the lines and pseudonyms

 

Arnold -

 

If you believe that anybody has violated the law, grow a friggin' pair and
report it, ok?

 

Otherwise you come across as extremely immature and irresponsible.  

 

You are an absolute biological miracle, Arnold; walking erect without a
friggin' backbone.

 

Another question, Arnold:  You stated earlier that J's minor child (her son)
wears camouflage clothing regularly.  Are we to assume from your statement
that you have observed her son on a regular basis?  I don't even know where
to start as far as what your statement implies, but I am certain the
authorities do.

 

Tom Hansen

Moscow, Idaho

 

"If not us, who?
If not now, when?"

- Unknown

 

  _____  

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Donovan Arnold
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 5:40 PM
To: Joan Opyr; Vision2020 Moscow
Subject: Re: [Vision2020]Getting to draw the lines and pseudonyms

 

Joan,

You ask what laws you have violated. OK, here are a few for to start.
Harassment, intimidation, and making threats. As for libelous, how about
looking back at some of your own emails and online publications. 

Refusing to accept the reality that J Ford is Jackie Woolf, that is fine, if
you are unable to read her IP address stamps and match numbers that is
believable. Some people refuse to read and believe the dinosaurs were around
65 million years ago and not ten thousand. But then again, just because it
is published information does not mean it is any good, I mean didn't
somebody publish something you tried to call a book?

Take Care,

_DJA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060420/e9b54cdc/attachment-0001.htm