[Vision2020] Boarding House information

Art Deco deco at moscow.com
Mon Apr 17 10:28:00 PDT 2006


http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Taxes/Avoidanaudit/P42263.asp

  The Basics 
      IRS pays informants to squeal on tax cheats
     
           
      While it may seem Orwellian, thousands of people each year take advantage of the IRS program. Here's how it works.

       By Jeff Schnepper

      "He's dead meat if he doesn't pay me. I won't sue him . . . I'll destroy him with one phone call!"

      Don't make Dave Cohen angry.

      Dave is a New Jersey tax attorney. His clients pay their bills, they suffer the hell of an IRS civil and criminal investigation. What Dave does is clearly unethical (that's why we can't use his real name), but he can't be caught. Dave is a snitch for the IRS.

      Dave had a client who was a restaurant owner. He gave Dave a $1,000 cash deposit, but refused to pay the balance of his bill. The restaurant owner was pocketing lots of cash income that never made it to his tax return -- a clear civil and criminal violation. As an attorney, Dave couldn't publicly violate attorney-client privilege, so he had a friend call the IRS with enough information to start an investigation. Looking for a loan?
            Check out MSN Money's
            Loan Center
           


      Swarms of agents descend
      Tips are important to the IRS. Annually, it collects more than $100 million and pays out from $2 million to $5 million to snitches. If you've ever heard the horror stories about the invasiveness of a normal IRS audit, they pale in comparison to a criminal investigation.

      In the case of our not-so-innocent restaurant owner, swarms of agents descended upon and paralyzed his business. For the next nine months, the owner endured the torture of Treasury agents peeling away every layer of his financial life, resulting in multiple thousands of dollars in taxes, fines, penalties and interest.

      He avoided jail only by hiring another attorney to negotiate a settlement with the IRS. The non-paying owner ended up spending more money on legal fees than on the tax he should have paid originally.

      Dave's friend even received a substantial reward for the information. And, of course, Dave's legal bill was finally paid.

      Motive isn't profit; it's revenge
      While the Internal Revenue Service doesn't publicly encourage tax informers, its representatives admit that many investigations couldn't be successfully conducted, or even started, without the use of paid informants or the direct purchase of evidence.

      Most informants are former employees of a business that has been underreporting its income. A disgruntled employee who doesn't inform on the business itself may squeal on its owner or a disliked manager.

      But a neighbor who objects to your loud stereo at midnight or becomes jealous of your new car each year may just as quickly turn informer. The emotional whirlpool of divorce is another great breeding ground for IRS informants, so be kind to your former spouse.

      Anyone who provides information that leads to the detection and punishment of any violation of the tax laws may be eligible for a reward (except for federal workers who get the information in pursuit of their duties). However, don't think this is the path to riches. Since 1960, only about 8% of filed claims have resulted in rewards.

      How to claim a reward
      IRS Publication 733 details the regulations for claiming a reward. You must complete IRS Form 211. Your information can be delivered personally to any IRS office, or you can write to:


        Head of the Criminal Investigation Division
        Internal Revenue Service
        Washington, DC 20224
      If a recovery is made as a direct result of information you provided, you may qualify for a reward of 15% of the amount recovered including taxes, fines and penalties, but not interest -- with a maximum payment of $2 million.

      If your information was valuable, although not specific, in determining liability, you may be rewarded with as much as 10% of the amount recovered, again with a $2 million cap.

      If your information was the originating cause of the investigation, but had no direct relationship to the determination of tax liability, the reward is 1% of the amount recovered, again with that $2 million limit.

      Using an assumed name
      If you're not claiming a reward for the information, you can use an assumed name. But if you want to claim a reward, you must use your own name. The IRS is legally prohibited from disclosing the identity of an informer to unauthorized persons.

      In 2003, the IRS paid out $4 million to informants who helped the IRS pursue 190 cases, which together recouped more than $61 million in taxes owed, USA Today reported. IRS statistics show that the agency has paid an average of 2.74% of recovered taxes as rewards to informants since 1967.

      No matter what you tell the IRS, and no matter how much they collect, all rewards are discretionary, not mandatory. The IRS is never obligated to pay a reward, unless you negotiate a signed contract in advance of providing the information. Moreover, all rewards are taxable income.

      Reasons why a reward might not be paid include:

        a.. The information was of no value, or

        b.. The information was already known by the IRS, or

        c.. The information was available in public records.
      Rewards are paid only after the tax is recovered, and that can take as long as five years or more. The informant isn't kept posted as to the progress of the investigation, but can check to see if the claim for a reward is still under active IRS consideration.

      The idea of informing on neighbors, colleagues or business associates is distasteful to most people; it's Orwellian. Yet, it's the honest taxpayer who winds up paying for tax fraud, and it's not just nickels and dimes. The IRS estimates that the gap between taxes owed and taxes paid is $127 billion. That's $1,000 extra in taxes for every individual return filed last year.

      And by the way, I always pay "Dave." 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Joan Opyr 
To: Vision2020 Moscow 
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Boarding House information


On Apr 15, 2006, at 7:52 AM, DonaldH675 at aol.com wrote:



  Just to put some speculation to rest about where I found some of the info about the boarding houses, try looking at the addresses of the NSA students in the petition in favor of NSA being downtown presented to the city council by Mr. Bob Heironymous.
   
  I find it illuminating that in all of the posts about my stealthy searches and peering in windows that not one of the posters had the fortitude to ask me where I found the information nor to deny the accuracy of my complaint. All of the posts are typical of the posters mentality when their ox is gored--personal attack, character assassination, or pure drivel about religious persecution.
   
  Don Huskey


Let's see, that's 17 oxes gored at an average cost of $1875 per month, assuming 5 boarders per household, and assuming that the City enforces the zoning code as written. Again, I will remind those raising the hue and cry (and phony baloney) of religious persecution that there is a simple, legal solution to this problem: spread the wealth. Why are there only 17 boarding houses for NSA students? There are more than 200 families in Christ Church and I don't know how many attending Trinity Reformed. 140 students might legally be spread, one student per household, among the many, rather than the few. Unless, of course, we're talking about the chosen few, and boarders are doled out as financial prizes. Is that the case? 

If anyone has purchased a house based on the expectation of a large and continued source of illegal income, that is not the concern of City officials. I'd love to own the McConnell Mansion, but I wouldn't make an offer based on plans for turning it into a meth lab or a bordello. Fun though that might be . . . 

Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment
www.joanopyr.com







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  The Basics 
      IRS pays informants to squeal on tax cheats
     
           
      While it may seem Orwellian, thousands of people each year take advantage of the IRS program. Here's how it works.

       By Jeff Schnepper

      "He's dead meat if he doesn't pay me. I won't sue him . . . I'll destroy him with one phone call!"

      Don't make Dave Cohen angry.

      Dave is a New Jersey tax attorney. His clients pay their bills, they suffer the hell of an IRS civil and criminal investigation. What Dave does is clearly unethical (that's why we can't use his real name), but he can't be caught. Dave is a snitch for the IRS.

      Dave had a client who was a restaurant owner. He gave Dave a $1,000 cash deposit, but refused to pay the balance of his bill. The restaurant owner was pocketing lots of cash income that never made it to his tax return -- a clear civil and criminal violation. As an attorney, Dave couldn't publicly violate attorney-client privilege, so he had a friend call the IRS with enough information to start an investigation. Looking for a loan?
            Check out MSN Money's
            Loan Center
           


      Swarms of agents descend
      Tips are important to the IRS. Annually, it collects more than $100 million and pays out from $2 million to $5 million to snitches. If you've ever heard the horror stories about the invasiveness of a normal IRS audit, they pale in comparison to a criminal investigation.

      In the case of our not-so-innocent restaurant owner, swarms of agents descended upon and paralyzed his business. For the next nine months, the owner endured the torture of Treasury agents peeling away every layer of his financial life, resulting in multiple thousands of dollars in taxes, fines, penalties and interest.

      He avoided jail only by hiring another attorney to negotiate a settlement with the IRS. The non-paying owner ended up spending more money on legal fees than on the tax he should have paid originally.

      Dave's friend even received a substantial reward for the information. And, of course, Dave's legal bill was finally paid.

      Motive isn't profit; it's revenge
      While the Internal Revenue Service doesn't publicly encourage tax informers, its representatives admit that many investigations couldn't be successfully conducted, or even started, without the use of paid informants or the direct purchase of evidence.

      Most informants are former employees of a business that has been underreporting its income. A disgruntled employee who doesn't inform on the business itself may squeal on its owner or a disliked manager.

      But a neighbor who objects to your loud stereo at midnight or becomes jealous of your new car each year may just as quickly turn informer. The emotional whirlpool of divorce is another great breeding ground for IRS informants, so be kind to your former spouse.

      Anyone who provides information that leads to the detection and punishment of any violation of the tax laws may be eligible for a reward (except for federal workers who get the information in pursuit of their duties). However, don't think this is the path to riches. Since 1960, only about 8% of filed claims have resulted in rewards.

      How to claim a reward
      IRS Publication 733 details the regulations for claiming a reward. You must complete IRS Form 211. Your information can be delivered personally to any IRS office, or you can write to:


        Head of the Criminal Investigation Division
        Internal Revenue Service
        Washington, DC 20224
      If a recovery is made as a direct result of information you provided, you may qualify for a reward of 15% of the amount recovered including taxes, fines and penalties, but not interest -- with a maximum payment of $2 million.

      If your information was valuable, although not specific, in determining liability, you may be rewarded with as much as 10% of the amount recovered, again with a $2 million cap.

      If your information was the originating cause of the investigation, but had no direct relationship to the determination of tax liability, the reward is 1% of the amount recovered, again with that $2 million limit.

      Using an assumed name
      If you're not claiming a reward for the information, you can use an assumed name. But if you want to claim a reward, you must use your own name. The IRS is legally prohibited from disclosing the identity of an informer to unauthorized persons.

      In 2003, the IRS paid out $4 million to informants who helped the IRS pursue 190 cases, which together recouped more than $61 million in taxes owed, USA Today reported. IRS statistics show that the agency has paid an average of 2.74% of recovered taxes as rewards to informants since 1967.

      No matter what you tell the IRS, and no matter how much they collect, all rewards are discretionary, not mandatory. The IRS is never obligated to pay a reward, unless you negotiate a signed contract in advance of providing the information. Moreover, all rewards are taxable income.

      Reasons why a reward might not be paid include:

        a.. The information was of no value, or

        b.. The information was already known by the IRS, or

        c.. The information was available in public records.
      Rewards are paid only after the tax is recovered, and that can take as long as five years or more. The informant isn't kept posted as to the progress of the investigation, but can check to see if the claim for a reward is still under active IRS consideration.

      The idea of informing on neighbors, colleagues or business associates is distasteful to most people; it's Orwellian. Yet, it's the honest taxpayer who winds up paying for tax fraud, and it's not just nickels and dimes. The IRS estimates that the gap between taxes owed and taxes paid is $127 billion. That's $1,000 extra in taxes for every individual return filed last year.

      And by the way, I always pay "Dave." 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Joan Opyr 
To: Vision2020 Moscow 
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Boarding House information


On Apr 15, 2006, at 7:52 AM, DonaldH675 at aol.com wrote:



  Just to put some speculation to rest about where I found some of the info about the boarding houses, try looking at the addresses of the NSA students in the petition in favor of NSA being downtown presented to the city council by Mr. Bob Heironymous.
   
  I find it illuminating that in all of the posts about my stealthy searches and peering in windows that not one of the posters had the fortitude to ask me where I found the information nor to deny the accuracy of my complaint. All of the posts are typical of the posters mentality when their ox is gored--personal attack, character assassination, or pure drivel about religious persecution.
   
  Don Huskey


Let's see, that's 17 oxes gored at an average cost of $1875 per month, assuming 5 boarders per household, and assuming that the City enforces the zoning code as written. Again, I will remind those raising the hue and cry (and phony baloney) of religious persecution that there is a simple, legal solution to this problem: spread the wealth. Why are there only 17 boarding houses for NSA students? There are more than 200 families in Christ Church and I don't know how many attending Trinity Reformed. 140 students might legally be spread, one student per household, among the many, rather than the few. Unless, of course, we're talking about the chosen few, and boarders are doled out as financial prizes. Is that the case? 

If anyone has purchased a house based on the expectation of a large and continued source of illegal income, that is not the concern of City officials. I'd love to own the McConnell Mansion, but I wouldn't make an offer based on plans for turning it into a meth lab or a bordello. Fun though that might be . . . 

Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment
www.joanopyr.com







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060417/750dce7a/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list