[Vision2020] more on the subject of my evangelical arm
keely emerinemix
kjajmix1 at msn.com
Sun Apr 16 16:50:41 PDT 2006
I answered too quickly and forgot a couple of other points, namely this: I
can barely lift a five-pound medicine ball with that arm, Ted. That means
the size of a good study Bible with concordance, or a bottle of pinot
grigio. If youwant someone who can do 100 lbs. at a straight lift, you'll
have to go find Carl Westberg.
I agree, more or less, with the definition provided for "evangelical," but I
would not include Reconstructionists, Christian Identity, or King James-only
fundamentalists. Generally, fundamentalists disallow any identification
with "evangelicals" and Identity groups hold to a vicious and ugly theology
that departs from historic, credal theology on a number of points, not the
least of which is its inevitable anti-Semitism. An alternative definition
(from a sociology professor I studied under in college) is this: a person
who, while holding to the traditional creeds of the orthodox (note: not
"Orthodox") historical Christian faith who additionally embraces the
following three tenets: The primacy of Christ as Savior, the need for a
personal, regenerative relationship with him, and the importance of personal
proclamation of the Gospel. Sorry, but dismantling worldly institutions to
usher in the dominion of the church, thus paving the way for the Millennium,
doesn't qualify (Reconstructionism); neither does the absurd belief that the
Twelve tribes migrated to what is now Great Britain and that none of them,
amazingly enough, were actually Jewish (Identity). And today's
fundamentalists, the KJV-only set, tend to not engage at all with
unbelievers and are critical of those who do, which would seem to violate
the third tenet of evangelicalism. (Remember, it was the fundies who
blasted that wild-eyed liberal, Billy Graham, in the 1960s for once sharing
a podium with -- gasp! -- Jews, Muslims, and . . . Methodists. Fortunately,
Billy survived their rebuke, while fundies now find themselves arguing about
who can be nastier in arguing about how damned everyone else is, for the
glory of God.
And fundies are resolutely patriarchial, which, I think, gets us back to our
opening salvo -- a rhetorical, not physical, salvo . . .
keely
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list