[Spam] RE: [Vision2020] Playfield

[James Reynolds]

For sure the Thompson property would be a better spot for a major sports 
complex. The access is better and the stores are closer. We could even crank 
up the volume and light up the sky. The cost may be prohibitive however. 
What we need is a Sugar-daddy to fulfill Moscow's want list.




>From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
>To: "'Donovan Arnold'" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>,        "'lfalen'" 
><lfalen at turbonet.com>,        "'James Reynolds'" 
><chapandmaize at hotmail.com>, <shawnc at outtrack.com>,        
><vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: RE: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] Playfield
>Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 13:00:40 -0700
>
>Arnold stated:
>
>
>
>"How about putting the park that needs lights somewhere else other than the
>only place in the city where we cannot have lights on."
>
>
>
>Yes.  How about the Thompson property?  The amount of money, time, and
>effort required to convert the Thompson property into a
>baseball/softball/soccer complex would be far less than required on the
>property south of the UI Arboretum.  This would also maintain the locale's
>"green"ery.
>
>
>
>Thoughts?
>
>
>
>Tom Hansen
>
>Moscow, Idaho
>
>
>
>"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
>safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in
>sideways, chocolate in one hand, a drink in the other, body thoroughly used
>up, totally worn out and screaming 'WOO HOO. What a ride!'"
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
>On Behalf Of Donovan Arnold
>Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:14 PM
>To: lfalen; James Reynolds; shawnc at outtrack.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] Playfield
>
>
>
>"There should be some sort of compromise here. Put in the lights. Lights 
>are
>a safety issue also.They do not have to be on all the time. I doubt the the
>observatory would require no lights every night or that the playfield would
>need them every night. Work out a schedule that accommodates both."--Roger
>Falen
>
>I agree Roger. The baseball team can use the lights everyday from 7 AM to
>7PM and the Observatory can have them off from 7PM to 7AM.--This would be
>fair.
>
>Of course, when you have people waiting years to use the observatory and
>millions of dollars in outside funding riding on it, it might take a while
>before the lights can come on at night. And also keep in mind that an image
>in space can take days to develop and lights turned on can ruin that image.
>
>Here is an idea. How about putting the park that needs lights somewhere 
>else
>other than the only place in the city where we cannot have lights on. Just 
>a
>thought.
>
>_DJA
>

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963