[Vision2020] Atwood Letter Rewritten

[g. crabtree]

Of course they do, that would be the guidelines I was referring to.  Zoning 
regulations, however say nothing with regard to whether the occupant is a 
"community-conscious businesses, not an arrogant, self-serving, restrictive 
"Good Ol' Boy" (GOB) network of hooligans." Once the guidelines/zoning regs 
are met folks like Hansen and yourself do not get much input into the 
buildings use and your opinion of the occupants matters not at all.

gc
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <joekc at adelphia.net>
To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at adelphia.net>
Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>; "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>; 
<DonaldH675 at aol.com>; "'Saundra Lund'" <sslund at adelphia.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Atwood Letter Rewritten


This is just false. There are in fact zoning laws and they apply as much to 
private buildings as public buildings.

--
Joe Campbell

---- "g. crabtree" <jampot at adelphia.net> wrote:

=============
Hansen, The buildings downtown are not publicly owned and as such you do not
get to have much input into what goes on in them. The bricks and mortar are
owned by private individuals or corporations, for the most part, and as such
can be used any way the owner sees fit, within some guidelines. One of those
guidelines is NOT how community conscious or arrogant the user is. I
personally believe that the building in question is being utilized by folks
who are good for downtown and good for the community. If you feel
differently perhaps you should acquire as much downtown property as you can
and apply your standards as you see fit. What I suspect you will actually do
however, is continue to carp ineffectually from the cheap seats.

gc

P.S. What is someone who has your "life is a ride" credo doing complaining
about a boisterous party, what ever that has to do with anything?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
To: "'g. crabtree'" <jampot at adelphia.net>; "'Saundra Lund'"
<sslund at adelphia.net>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Cc: <DonaldH675 at aol.com>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 5:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Atwood Letter Rewritten


> gc stated -
>
> "My point with regard to tax exemption was that NSA like ALL schools is
> tax
> exempt no matter where they are located. This being the case, NSA's tax
> status was irrelevant to the BOA."
>
> Perhaps the BOA did not take NSA's tax status into consideration while
> they
> were busy gift wrapping the CUP.  They should have.
>
> Prime retail locations within Moscow's central business district should be
> limited to tax-paying, community-conscious businesses, not an arrogant,
> self-serving, restrictive "Good Ol' Boy" (GOB) network of hooligans that
> place themselves above the law.
>
> We can only be thankful that this GOB network restricts its flagrant
> violations to their digs on Main Street.  I mean, it's not like they
> disturbed the peace with a loud, late night party, huh?
>
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
>
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>
> *************************************************
>
> "When people sin, everybody has to pay."
>
> - Douglas Wilson of Wilson, Inc. (dba Christ Church) (June 7, 2002)
>
> For more details:  http://www.NotOnThePalouse.com
>
> *************************************************
>
>
>
>


_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯