[Vision2020] Chasuk's Question

[josephc at mail.wsu.edu]

Dear Jim,

Just wondering: How were you able to determine that Chasuk's question was
unanswerable? What reasoning process did you use to reach that conclusion?
What evidence do you have in support of that claim?

Joe Campbell

>
> Chasuk,
> Your questions seem  rhetorical, thus unanswered. However, I will weigh
> in and say that personally, I prefer not to dwell on unanswerable
> questions. To dwell on unanswerable questions is to partake in
> intellectual masturbation, something I don't particularly have time for.
> There are too many other, more important things to be concerned about,
> things that might actually make a positive difference in the world. Not
> that it is bad to be introspective about one's belief  in the nature of
> the universe, but I'd just personally rather work on more concrete
> endeavors.
>
> Jim Meyer

Chasuk's question:
>>> Intelligent design holds that Darwin's theory of natural selection
over time
>>> cannot fully explain the origin of life or the emergence of highly
complex
>>> life forms. It implies that life on Earth is the product of an
unidentified,
>>> intelligent force.