[Vision2020] Idahoan Votes 'No' on Aid
Tbertruss at aol.com
Tbertruss at aol.com
Sat Sep 10 12:20:13 PDT 2005
All:
Otter might have some good reasons to have voted "no" on this $51.8 billion
Hurricane relief from the federal government. The majority of his own party
supported it, so perhaps his vote was on principle, not politics? Otter also
has opposed aspects of the Patriot Act, another independent position against the
lock step of republican group think.
President Bush and the Republican party are scrambling with public relations
damage control over the handling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster, and this
huge spending bill for relief, etc., some view with a jaundiced eye seeing Carl
Rove (what happened to the CIA operative identity leak from the White House
that implicated Rove?) managing spin control to bolster the image of Bush and
other Republicans: 2006 mid term elections are gearing up and democrats no
doubt expect to make gains!
It appears democrats aren't the only political party that acts as though
throwing huge amounts of government money at a problem will automatically solve
it!
The Dept. of Homeland Security is a creation of a republican dominated
federal government, and observers of all political persuasions agree to some extent
that this dept. did not perform as intended in the response to Katrina. But
throwing $51.8 billion dollars at this disaster makes our republican dominated
government look like it is taking charge, even if the money may be mismanaged
without accountability to the taxpayer.
Ted Moffett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050910/ced6f05f/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list