[Vision2020] Libby, Rove Had Roles in Leak

[Tom Hansen]

Greetings Visionaires -

>From today's (October 2, 2005) Spokesman Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Libby, Rove had roles in leak 
Revelations counter earlier statements from White House

Jim VandeHei and Walter Pincus
Washington Post
October 2, 2005

WASHINGTON - As the CIA leak investigation heads toward its expected
conclusion this month, it has become increasingly clear that two of the most
powerful men in the Bush administration were more involved in the unmasking
of operative Valerie Plame than the White House originally indicated.

With New York Times reporter Judith Miller's release from jail Thursday and
testimony Friday before a federal grand jury, the role of I. Lewis "Scooter"
Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, came into clearer focus.
Libby, a central figure in the probe since its earliest days and the vice
president's main counselor, discussed Plame with at least two reporters but
testified that he never mentioned her name or her covert status at the CIA,
according to lawyers in the case.

 
His story is similar to that of Karl Rove, President Bush's top political
adviser. Rove, who was not an initial focus of the investigation, testified
that he, too, talked with two reporters about Plame but never supplied her
name or CIA role.

Their testimony seems to contradict what the White House was saying a few
months after Plame's CIA job became public.

In October 2003, White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters he
personally asked Libby and Rove if they were involved "so I could come back
to you and say they were not involved." Asked if that was a categorical
denial of their involvement, he said, "That is correct."

What remains a central mystery in the case is whether special prosecutor
Patrick Fitzgerald has accumulated evidence during his two-year
investigation that any crime was committed. His investigation has White
House aides and congressional Republicans on edge as they await Fitzgerald's
announcement of an indictment or conclusion of the probe with no charges.
The grand jury is scheduled to expire Oct. 28, and lawyers in the case
expect Fitzgerald to signal his intentions as early as this week.

Fitzgerald is investigating whether anyone illegally disclosed Plame's name
or undercover CIA job in retaliation against her husband, Joseph C. Wilson.
In the summer of 2003, Wilson, a former diplomat, accused the White House of
using "twisted" intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq.

He claimed firsthand evidence: At the behest of the CIA, he had flown to
Niger in February 2002 to investigate the administration's assertion that
Iraq was trying to purchase uranium in the African nation for use in its
nuclear weapons program. Wilson returned unconvinced the assertion was true.
However, Bush himself made the charge in his 2003 State of the Union
address, prompting Wilson to spread word throughout the government and
eventually make public his rebuttal in the news media.

Many lawyers in the case have been skeptical that Fitzgerald has the
evidence to prove a violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act,
which is the complicated crime he first set out to investigate and requires
showing that government officials knew an operative had covert status and
intentionally leaked the agent's identity.

But a new theory about Fitzgerald's aim has emerged in recent weeks from two
lawyers who have had extensive conversations with the prosecutor while
representing witnesses in the case. They surmise that Fitzgerald is
considering whether he can bring charges of a criminal conspiracy
perpetrated by a group of senior Bush administration officials. Under this
legal tactic, Fitzgerald would attempt to establish that at least two or
more officials agreed to take affirmative steps to discredit and retaliate
against Wilson and leak sensitive government information about his wife. To
prove a criminal conspiracy, the actions need not have been criminal, but
conspirators must have had a criminal purpose.

Lawyers involved in the case interviewed for this report agreed to talk only
if their names were not used, citing Fitzgerald's request for secrecy.

One source briefed on Miller's account of conversations with Libby said it
is doubtful her testimony would on its own lead to charges against any
government officials. But, the source said, her account could establish a
piece of a web of actions taken by officials that had an underlying criminal
purpose.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

That Teflon must be wearing pretty thin on King George and Karl Rove right
about now.

Take care, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Who does live in Moscow, Idaho

"Only in America do we have a general in charge of the post office and a
secretary in charge of defense." 

-Unknown