[Vision2020] kirk email

[Michael]

Chas Wrote:

 

I'm curious: what would constitute sufficient evidence to haul it into the
public square?

 

 

Me:

 

Ok, perhaps you are right.  This is why I followed up my comment with the
fact that "at the very least.more judiciously."  Perhaps the implicit
conclusion behind the presentation of the evidence needed more moderation,
or perhaps it could have been presented as a fact without any assumed
conclusion.  What you think?

 

Dale, think twice before sending the next email : -)

 

Thanks
Michael Metzler 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20051108/392ca84f/attachment.htm