[Vision2020] kirk email

[Chasuk]

On 11/8/05, Michael <metzler at moscow.com> wrote:

> From what I know about Dale... he had reason to believe that Nate wasn't encouraged by or in consultation with the elders. Now, the pdf thing that you mention does present evidence to the contrary; but I don't think this was sufficient evidence to haul it into the public square.

I'm curious: what would constitute sufficient evidence to haul it into
the public square?