[Vision2020] The Last Part of Q2 For Wayne

[Michael]

Michael, Please answer the last part of [Q2]. W.

 

 

Ok; give it a shot anyway:

If a deductive argument was presented, and I thought the deductive argument
was clearly valid-in priori fashion-and I believed the premises were as true
as anything could possibly be true, then I would suspect that I would say
the argument worked; I'd say that the argument demonstrates a contradiction
in this case.  As for whether or not I would conclude that the Eternal God
could not exist, that would be another matter, a point I noted about the
nature of my 'total body of evidence.'  Of course, we haven't even gotten to
the issue of the rationality of basic beliefs and epistemic defeaters.

 

Thanks,

Michael Metzler

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20051104/379acc70/attachment.htm