[Vision2020] Geeh melynda
thansen at moscow.com
Tue May 31 05:33:35 PDT 2005
Greetings Visionaires -
For those of you who are interested, Wayne Fox's claims are supported by
more than hot air. Take a look at:
As far as Mr. Nesbit's comments are concerned, well . . . you know . . . He
appears to be another lame duck from our local quack factory.
Take care, Moscow.
Tom "who likes his water clean and plentiful" Hansen
We could learn a lot from crayons: some are sharp, some are pretty, some are
dull, some have weird names, and all are different colors....but they all
exist very nicely in the same box.
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Phil Nisbet
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 10:38 PM
To: Vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Geeh melynda
Yes, you really do need to stop pissing in the wind and hoping that the
splatter will cause harm to your opposition. Try researching and seeking
the truth in the first place and you might avoid some of the false
statements and missteps you seem relatively prone to.
First, you wrongly accused me of criminality and attempted to influence
public officials with baseless claims. The investigations that I underwent
found that I had committed no wrong going, but you refuse to acknowledge
that you were wrong.
Then you lay the false claim that the company I work for is 'behind' Naylor
Farms and that we some how intend to conduct a minerals operation at that
property. That statement is demonstrably false, has been shown to be false
and is based on a minority share position in the company by the Naylors in
what is a public company. That accusation of yours suggests that i minerals
inc is involved in what would be a criminal conspiracy, since as a public
company, i minerals inc has to disclose any and all of its acquisitions,
which of course would include any stake or holding in a property like Naylor
To bolster your claim, you make some sort of big deal about share ownership
by the Naylors, whose minority shareholding does not even allow them a seat
on i mineral inc's Board of Directors. Rather than simply say, "Geeh,
sorry, I might have been wrong and not had my facts straight", you just keep
You plug on that one just as you have on the very false statement that
Naylor Farms request for water was equal to the use of Moscow and Pullman
combined. I keep seeing that number pushed, yet, it has been demonstrated
to be false by ever single geologist and hydrologist who have testified at
the various hearings, by the Palouse Basin Aquifer Committee, by Idaho
Department of Resources and a host of others. Rather than admit you used a
scare tactic inflated number and that the real figure is less than 10% of
the value you love to continue to quote, you still push that falsehood to
the public both here and on your various websites and blogs.
So as you tell these people here that they need to look closely at anything
the Naylors say, perhaps you should also state that they should look at
your statements with a gargantuan grain of salt and examined very, very
As for the rest of your posting, I will take the time and deconstruct it
properly. As with the rest of your statements, you have done insufficient
research and have grounded yourself pretty poorly prior to making sweeping
and false allegations. That is never a wise move, Wayne, since doing so
tends to come back and bite one in the posterior.
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
More information about the Vision2020