[Vision2020] Re: NSA is a PRIVATE Institution

[Donovan Arnold]

J,

“they are a PRIVATE institution that does NOT receive
any public monies what-so-ever and are NOT, therefore,
under any obligation to be qualified or approved or
accreditated of by the State of Idaho”

Accreditation has nothing to do with a school being
private or not. Harvard, Yale, and Albertson are all
accredited private colleges. Meanwhile, public
institutions like Lewis and Clark have numerous
programs that are not accredited like their nursing
program. 

There is nothing in the law that changes the city
definition of “Educational Institution” based on if
they need accreditation or not. It simply states it
must have it, not why, not maybe, or unless, it must. 

Lawmakers do understand the difference between an
accredited or non-accredited college it did not just
get slipped into the law by accident. It was
intentionally put there. 

Take Care,

Donovan J Arnold




--- J Ford <privatejf32 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> To add to the below:
> 
> "The institution MUST be
> accredited by the Idaho State Board of Education or
> an
> agency recognized by them. That is the law. PERIOD.
> ...If NSA gets accredited, by the Idaho State Board
> of
> Education, then they would no longer be allowed
> downtown. But they are not accredited."
> 
> Again, to make it really, really clear - they are a
> PRIVATE institution that 
> does NOT receive any public monies what-so-ever and
> are NOT, therefore, 
> under any obligation to be qualified or approved or
> accreditated of by the 
> State of Idaho - Period.  Nor are NSA, Atlas, Logos
> or any of CC's other 
> private in-home "learning" centers looking to be
> accreditated by the State 
> of Idaho.  They only have to be accreditated by an
> organization THEY (CC) 
> recognizes as being in authority - we all know Doug
> et al does NOT recognize 
> the State or Feds as being in authority over them
> regarding their schools.
> 
> THEY are defining themselves as a college, they are
> NOT saying they are a 
> "trade" school and they are in violation of the law
> as far as being in CBD 
> is concerned.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >Donovan wrote:
> >
> >It does however, fit the definition of a
> >"Trade/commercial school".
> >
> >This statement is what I focused on in my comment
> today regarding what
> >definition fits NSA.  NSA is not claiming they are
> a "trade/commercial
> >school."  So your comment above contradicts NSA's
> own description
> >regarding how they define themselves  Whether or
> not you are intending
> >to have any inside knowledge of how NSA defines
> itself, or have any
> >knowledge whatsoever of NSA's intentions regarding
> anything, your
> >statement asserts that NSA is defined as a kind of
> institution they
> >are not claiming to be.
> >
> >You can either admit that you think they are a kind
> of institution
> >they claim they are NOT, or you can retract your
> statement that you
> >believe NSA to be defined as a "trade/commercial
> school," or you can
> >provide verifiable evidence that NSA seeks to be
> defined or is now
> >defining itself as a "trade/commercial school."
> >
> >Regardless of what legal arguments you are making,
> if you base them on
> >NSA being defined as a "trade/commercial school,"
> you are
> >contradicting NSA's own assessments of what sort of
> institution they
> >are, as far as the statements that I have read from
> NSA spokespeople
> >indicate.
> >
> >You very clearly dodged the central point of my
> post today that you
> >answered today.  I trust the above clarification
> will explain my
> >reasoning.
> >
> >Ted Moffett
> >
> >
> >On 5/14/05, Donovan Arnold
> <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Mr. Moffett,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your comments. Please allow me to
> > > qualify my statements and position.
> > >
> > > You wrote,
> > >
> > > "Are you saying you understand the law and the
> > > intentions of NSA that impacts their legal
> status more
> > > than NSA does?"
> > >
> > > You misunderstand, I NOT attempting to defend or
> > > protect NSA. I am not privy to the long or short
> term
> > > interests of NSA. I am arguing that the law is
> not
> > > being followed.
> > >
> > > The complaint filed is premised on the prospect
> that
> > > New St.Andrews is an "Educational Institution"
> as
> > > defined by City Code. It is NOT because it is
> not an
> > > accredited institution. The institution MUST be
> > > accredited by the Idaho State Board of Education
> or an
> > > agency recognized by them. That is the law.
> PERIOD.
> > >
> > > To force NSA out, without legal authorization is
> not
> > > legal enforcement, it is mob mentality. If NSA
> is
> > > violating the law by being downtown they need to
> file
> > > a complaint that is consistent with the law, not
> > > contrary to it and hope emotions and feelings
> float it
> > > through.
> > >
> > > If NSA gets accredited, by the Idaho State Board
> of
> > > Education, then they would no longer be allowed
> > > downtown. But they are not accredited.
> > >
> > > To ignore the law to enforce the law makes law
> inane.
> > >
> > > Take Care,
> > >
> > > Donovan J Arnold
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Mail
> > > Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take
> the tour:
> > > http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>_____________________________________________________
> >  List services made available by First Step
> Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since
> 1994.
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger!
> Download today - it's FREE! 
>
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
>
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>  
>                http://www.fsr.net                   
>    
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail