[Vision2020] The Genie Is Out Of The Bottle
Tbertruss at aol.com
Tbertruss at aol.com
Tue Mar 22 13:40:04 PST 2005
Donovan et. al.
Obviously you have not studied the issue of planning for nuclear war in
depth. In fact there are individuals in power in both the USA and Russia who will
calmly discuss the survivability of a nuclear war. The theory of MAD
(mutually assured destruction) may not be workable in the long run to prevent nuclear
war. The future could bring circumstances where a nation decides they will
take their chances at making a decisive first strike. If a nation was going
under already, facing a massive invasion, starvation, etc., what would they have
to lose in using their nuclear weapons anyway?
In fact there were members of the US military during the Cold War who wanted
to take out the Soviet Union with a massive nuclear attack reasoning that the
sooner we did it the less time there was for the Soviet Union to become more
powerful. And the brinkmanship of the theory of MAD means both sides are
looking for a sneak attack, ready to launch as quickly as possible, to prevent the
first strike advantage. This hair trigger brinkmanship could lead to an all
out nuclear war even when both sides do not want it.
Consider that we have had a nuclear arsenal for no more than 60 years or so.
Changes inside Russia, or an expansion of China's nuclear arsenal, and the
continuing spread of nuclear weapons technology to other nations, will make the
nuclear weapons game much more complicated and dangerous in the future. Think
ahead 100 years when the world may face ecological disasters, a huge energy
crisis with dwindling fossil fuels, a population of 15 billion, potential mass
starvation, etc., with numerous nations with nuclear arms.
You are wrong to think that if a small group of terrorists planned to strike
the USA with a stolen or stealthily built nuclear weapon that we would have no
target for retaliation. We might pick the wrong target, but what happened
after 9/11? I will refresh your memory to remind you that the USA has
"retaliated" against two nations already for 9/11, an attack carried out by a small
group of terrorists, though you can argue we have not targeted the actual
terrorists and their support structure, who carried out 9/11.
But if Islamic terrorists knew that if they used a nuclear weapon against the
USA that we would, for example, wipe Iran and Mecca off the map, would this
not be some deterrent?
Ted Moffett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050322/94669834/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list