[Vision2020] A question for all - What's right/wrong with thispicture?

[tbertruss at aol.com]

Bill et. al.
 
The consensus that I have gathered from reading V2020 is two or three posts per day per person for a "limit."  I have not read many opinions insisting on only one post per day per person.  This is my second post today.  The need for more than one post per person per day is be able to correct something misstated or to answer an objection from another V2020 subscriber.
 
Ted Moffett 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill London <london at moscow.com>
To: Mark Seman <FCS at moscow.com>; vision2020 at moscow.com; Tbertruss at aol.com
Sent: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:03:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A question for all - What's right/wrong with thispicture?


Moscow Vision 2020 has, for more than 10 years, been an unmoderated community list.  Comments from elected officials or staff members are always welcome.
 
To strengthen its usefulness, V2020 members have set guidelines for participation including:
1. Subscribers should use their own actual names, no anonymous posts
2. Posts should focus on issues, not individuals, to lessen name-calling and petty bickering
3. No more than one post per day per person.
 
BL
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mark Seman 
To: vision2020 at moscow.com ; Tbertruss at aol.com 
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] A question for all - What's right/wrong with thispicture?


Ted,
Your comments are most welcome.  I did not anticipate the potential spam issues in my interest to send to such a wide audience.  I did not ask the individuals ahead of time and it may have been troublesome for some - I have not yet heard.  To those of you I may have bothered too much with my post, I extend my sincere apologies.
 
Maybe my sending blind copies might be a solution for the problem you bring up, but there also must be a better way.
 
Mark
 

Mark Seman, Architect
Heather Seman, Landscape Architect
1404 East 'F' Street  Moscow, Idaho 83843
v 208-883-3276 / f 208-883-0112
-----Original Message-----
From: Tbertruss at aol.com [mailto:Tbertruss at aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 3:19 PM
To: FCS at moscow.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A question for all - What's right/wrong with this picture?



Mark et. al.

Placing that long list of e-mail addresses onto a public list serve that could result in someone anywhere in the world on the Internet blasting all those e-mail addresses with a bunch of crap they don't want in their inbox is not a wise idea.

Maybe all those individuals behind those addresses are members of the V2020 list, but I doubt it.  And if they are, it is redundant to include all those addresses.  Did you ask all of these individuals if they want to receive the potential e-mails that posting their addresses onto a public Internet list serve might generate?  As if we don't have enough problems with spam, scams and nonsense on the Internet?

This response to your post answers a tiny part of the question "what part of this is not working and why is it not?"

Notice that First Step no longer makes the V2020 subscriber list publicly viewable.  Good idea!

Ted Moffett 



_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

_____________________________________________________
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050605/474be99a/attachment-0001.htm