[Vision2020] The Recall

[Tom Hansen]

I now see the light and I agree, Mr. Danahy.

 

I feel that she should come clean and admit that she also writes as a female
septuagenarian.  Could this foreshadow that she represents the opinions of
all women and/or all elderly citizens and/or all women between 70 and 79
years of age?

 

After having met her several times, I must admit that she camouflages her
gender-based septuagenarian"ism" extremely well.  After several discussions
with her, my impression is of a person that is anything but elderly who
seems to strongly support the radical concept that women are equal.  

 

Question, Mr. Danahy:  Do all dentists share Mr. Weitz' "petition" or simply
the misguided ones?

 

Take care,

 

Tom Hansen

One of the "49 Percenters" whose membership is primarily Pagan (but that's
another story).

 

 

We could learn a lot from crayons: some are sharp, some are pretty, some are
dull, some have weird names, and all are different colors....but they all
exist very nicely in the same box. 

 

  _____  

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of John Danahy
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:52 PM
To: 'Joan Opyr'; 'Vision2020 Moscow'
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] The Recall

 

 

 

Joan writes: 

I agree that the recall should be discussed on 2020, but I think it's
important to take note of the way in which this recall is being conducted --
in the dark, the petition being circulated by "anonymous" businessmen,.

Why is it important to take note?  Why not just support the decision of the
council?

Again Joan writes: 

Now, you ask what's sleazy, what's sinister, what's irrational and little
boy about this recall effort?  

            But I didn't ask!!  I suggested that the words used above were
not directed at the recall effort but at Dr. Weitz.  Why not engage in civil
discourse without inflammatory language?  Why not discuss the issues and not
the people?  The fact that the DN reported this interview on page one is why
I don't read it.

 And lastly Joan writes:

I think it's worth noting that neither Lois nor Bill are entirely subsumed
by the Moscow Civic Association.  They are members of that organization, but
first and foremost, they are private citizens, and they are taxpaying
residents of the City of Moscow.  Why assume when they speak, they speak
always for the MCA?  Sometimes, unless they indicate otherwise, I would
assume they speak for themselves.  

I don't think I assumed that they were speaking for anyone but themselves,
but the fact that they both have a close association with the MCA is
appropriate.

 

John


  _____  

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050106/aa827d15/attachment.htm