[Vision2020] Saturday's paper
Shelly
CJs at turbonet.com
Sun Dec 18 14:11:30 PST 2005
"I don't know that we disagree on this issue -- perhaps we do. However, I
*am* puzzled at your implication that I somehow think he doesn't belong in
jail because that's just not accurate: if he can't post bond, then that's
where he needs to be. And, no -- I'm not willing to contribute to any bail
fund :-) I don't know the man and I certainly wouldn't be willing to vouch
for his appearing at future court dates."
Saundra: he cannot post bail TODAY. Tomorrow is yet to come.
"Why else would twenty women come forward for testing . . . "
"My understanding -- and someone please correct me if I'm wrong -- was that
the testing wasn't exclusively for women whom had contact with Mubita, it
was for *anyone* concerned about HIV exposure. It's a sad fact that there's
some high risk behavior out there, and unless one of the criteria for
testing was contact with Mubita, I don't see any reason for assuming that
all who showed up were concerned *only* because of contact with Mubita."
No Saundra, this is incorrect. You can call Carol Morley at the Health
District and ask her. They had "kits" to test those at "high risk." Many
people were turned away with an appointment after they were counseled. The
purpose of the health clinic staying open last Thursday was strictly for the
high risk people that were in direct contact with Mubita as the Health
Department had limited kits. There were many people who showed up who had no
contact with Mubita but wanted tested. They were given appointments.
Shelley Roderick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20051218/0fbe7896/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list