[Vision2020] Public prayer on public money

Donovan Arnold donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 16 23:04:49 PDT 2005


Saying a prayer before a public meeting is not an
establishment of religion. Establishment of religion
is when the government, king, dictator, etc. supports,
funds and defines a religion as the official religion
of a nation or state. In the past, the government
would often give special privilege to those that
practiced that official established religion. In some
cases, people were killed or persecuted for not
following the faith as prescribed by the government.
This is what the establishment of religion means, and
what was meant when the forefathers wrote the
Constitution. How do we know? Because US Congress has
always had prayer before business. So people can twist
it all they want, but it was not meant to prevent
prayer before a public meeting.

It is not true to say the 1st amendment was designed
to prevent public prayer. Nor is saying a prayer
establishment of a religion. God is on our money and
in our pledge and those that try to remove it are just
idiots with obvious nothing better to do than bitch
and complain and force themselves on everyone else. It
is my belief that a few people are trying to prevent
me and others from practicing our religion and prayer.
Those that do this are forcing their beliefs on me and
95% of those that wish to worship and appreciate what
God has given them. If you do not want to pray, DON'T
PRAY, nobody is forcing you to, but do not prevent the
rest of us from doing so.

Donovan J Arnold

 

--- Joan Opyr <joanopyr at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Kai writes (as per): 
> 
> > The First Amendment of the Constitution of the
> United States of America
> > Congress shall make no law respecting an
> establishment of religion, or
> > prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
> abridging the freedom of speech,
> > or of the press; or the right of the people
> peaceably to assemble, and to
> > petition the Government for a redress of
> grievances.
> >
> > I don't see anything in there that says they
> "can't" pray beforehand....
> As
> > a matter of fact I see that it say "prohibiting
> the free exercise
> thereof".
> > I don't see anything that says "except in public
> buildings".
> > Seems to me people are free to join in....or not.
> 
> And it seems to me that every single court that has
> considered this case
> (on up to the Supreme Court, which allowed the lower
> court ruling to stand)
> has agreed that the Great Falls City Council has no
> business conducting
> public prayers of any sort.  That, if you'll recall,
> was the gist of the
> CNN story Wayne forwarded to the list.  Your reading
> of the First
> Amendment, Kai, while no doubt shared by many
> citizens both here and in
> Great Falls, was not and is not shared by the
> courts.  Why?  Because while
> the members of the Great Falls City Council may pray
> all they like in
> private -- and, as individuals, there's nothing to
> stop any council member
> from praying before, during, or after a city council
> meeting -- but
> *conducting* public prayers amounts to the
> establishment of a particular
> religion for the citizens of Great Falls.  (The
> important word in the
> preceding sentence is "establishment," as in
> Establishment Clause,
> violation of.)  
> 
> FYI, the "you can join in or not while we pray to
> the God of our choice"
> argument was long ago rejected as a rationale for
> prayer in public schools.
> It should come as a surprise to no one that this
> argument has been rejected
> in the Great Falls case.  The Great Falls City
> Council has just thrown --
> what was it?  $65,000? out the window arguing a case
> that was settled (as
> Melynda has pointed out) back in 1963.   
> 
> Now, should the Moscow City Council decide to pray
> to the Flying Spaghetti
> Monster (www.venganza.com), I might have to change
> sides on this issue.  I
> might have to join with the Reverend Boyardee to
> fight for their right to
> waste our tax dollars worshipping meatballs and
> marinara.  
> 
> Maybe we could ask Gambino's to cater city council
> meetings?  Holy Eggplant
> Parmesan!
> 
> Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment
> www.auntie-establishment.com
>   
> 
> 
>
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>  
>                http://www.fsr.net                   
>    
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list