[Vision2020] Historical Revisionism and the Trinity Festival
Nick Gier
ngier at uidaho.edu
Wed Aug 3 09:57:43 PDT 2005
Hail to the Vision!
This column has appeared in the on-line magazine New West and will appear
in the Sandpoint Reader very soon. My interaction with Pastor Lillback has
been a model of civil interchange. Perhaps the good pastor can teach
Pastor Wilson a few manners during his stay in Moscow. Since the eloquent
dressing down that he received from an anonymous Christian, I've noticed
that Wilson has reduced his name calling dramatically. (I'm now just an
enemy rather than a banshee.) But he has a long way to go to meet the
challenge of his kind Christian critic.
Historical Revisionism at Moscows Trinity Festival
by Nick Gier
The Trinity Festival (August 8-10) sponsored by Moscows Christ Church is
bringing conservative Christians from all over the country.
I studied theology with Christian Trinitarians in graduate school, and Ive
taught with many of them as well. My Lutheran colleagues in the theological
faculties at Heidelberg, Århus, and Copenhagen were fervent Trinitarians,
and I respected their belief in divine threeness as much as they respected
my affirmation of divine unity.
None of these fine Christians used the Trinity as a club to hit me over the
head and to tell me that I, as a Unitarian, could be nothing but a
conformist or a power hungry, humorless rapist. But this is exactly what
these Moscow Trinitarians are saying about both religious and secular
people who do not follow their narrow version of Christianity. They claim
that their theology will bring beautiful to the world, but so far what I've
seen is pretty ugly.
Moscows Trinity Festival continues the annual history conference that
Douglas Wilsons church has held in Moscow since 1994. I set off history
with quotation marks because the conference speakers have made a mockery of
the academic study of history.
Wilsons 1994 history conference led to the publication of the now
infamous Southern Slavery As It Was, which has been roundly condemned by
real historians, including a civil war expert in Wilsons mission church in
Seattle. In addition, 20 percent of the text was copied from another
controversial book on slavery.
This years topic is the American Revolution, and Wilson, Steven Wilkins
(Wilsons co-author on the slavery booklet), and Peter A. Lillback, all
conservative Presbyterian pastors, will present papers.
In 1994 Wilson and Wilkins told their audience that the antebellum South
was the most harmonious multiracial society in human history, and now
Pastor Lillback is prepared to claim that George Washington, the least
religious of the early presidents, was in fact an orthodox Christian.
Lillback has been generous enough to share some of his views with me, and I
do hope that professional historians have a chance to review his methods
and evidence before he publishes his book.
To his credit Lillback has conceded that there is no historical evidence
for Washington praying in Valley Forge (the subject of a famous painting
that hangs in the nations capitol), and there was no evidence that an
alleged prayer diary comes from Washingtons hand. The text is perfectly
spelled (Washington was a horrible speller) and reads very much like the
Common Book of Prayer. The Smithsonian Institution has rejected it as a
forgery.
Lillback claims to have evidence from several pastors who attested to
Washingtons Christian devotion, but many more Christian ministers claimed
just the opposite.
Here are some items that count heavily against Lillbacks thesis:
· At least three ministers testified that they never saw Washington
kneeling in prayer or taking Communion, an absolute necessity for being an
Anglican Christian. After being criticized for not taking this sacrament,
Washington stopped attending church on Communion Sunday. After his
retirement he did not go to church at all, preferring to collect his land
rent instead.
· The day he left the presidency he was happy to answer many
questions, but he refused to answer the question Are you a
Christian? If Lillbacks thesis is correct, this issue would have been
long settled in peoples minds.
· It was James Madison's opinion that Washington never "attended
to the arguments for Christianity, and for the different systems of
religion, [n]or in fact ... [had he] formed definite opinions on the
subject."
· In 1831 Episcopal priest Bird Wilson proclaimed that among all
our presidents from Washington downward, not one was a professor of
religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism.
· Article Eleven of Treaty of Tripoli states that the government
of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian
religion." Washington introduced this treaty to the Senate,
the Senate ratified it without recorded debate, and it was signed
by President John Adams, a person with much stronger Christian
credentials than Washington.
· At Washingtons death no pastor was called, no scriptures were
read, no prayers were said, and no rituals were performed.
I asked Lillback if he really wanted to share the stage with speakers who
have been so thoroughly discredited. His response was that Christian
charity compelled him not to judge them until he personally appraises their
performance in Moscow.
I reminded him that the evidence of plagiarism and response of critics are
already well documented at www.tomandrodna.com/notonthepalouse, but he
appears determined to join the swelling ranks of Christian revisionist
historians.
Nick Gier taught religion and philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31
years. His essay Religious Liberalism and the Founding Fathers can be
found at www.class.uidaho.edu/ngier/foundfathers.htm. His full response to
vicious Trinitarianism can be found at www.class.uidaho.edu/ngier/trinity.htm.
"The god you worship is the god you deserve."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050803/73778f55/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list