[Vision2020] Why I voted NO

[Carl Westberg]

Well....alright then.  But, how do you feel about the designated hitter, 
Phil?                                                                        
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                       Carl Westberg Jr.

>From: cjs <cjs at turbonet.com>
>To: Vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Why I voted NO
>Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:27:21 -0700
>
>Dear Keely and Joan,
>
>We are putting together our thoughts over the weekend's emails. Well, as 
>best we can because of the avoidance of almost every question asked. Your 
>misleading of information is well addressed in your responses to the 
>listeners on V2020. Not sure if you are listening Joan. Don't care. You 
>seem to be unhappy because of your hate responses to a lot of people in the 
>community. I am reminded of one other entity that crawled on this planet. 
>His propaganda influenced millions. He not only took the lives of innocent 
>people but their money and well being. He was also a writer similar to your 
>style.
>
>Keely - I am sure you are a wonderful person and friend. However, I am not 
>happy with you as my school district trustee. You avoid some of the most 
>critical questions proposed to you. As a trustee, you should be educating 
>the voters on both sides of the bond. As our trustee you are to inform us 
>and represent us as to where answers can be found. No, it is not your duty 
>to answer the questions. It is your duty to refer us to where we can get 
>the answers. No where do I see any information from you to the contrary. I 
>do not see any facts coming from you directly. Or from anyone on your side 
>of the fence including broken and misleading websites, the school district 
>in not abiding by the rule of getting us the right knowledge we need in 
>order to make a voting decision, the architect that won't talk to anyone, 
>CQE, FPC and the  likes all to the benefit of a few. A very powerful few. 
>You keep saying vote for the kids. You should be saying vote yes for a new 
>high school. Keely, it ap!
>  pears you
>have something to gain  possibly from The Trails in your efforts to pass 
>this bond. All you do is try to sell us a new high school. I am not going 
>to go into detail on all the questions we have asked and have been 
>misinformed or not informed at all. The readers already know.
>
>Due to the way the information or lack of was distributed to the public I 
>can assure you that when this bond goes down in flames that all of your 
>careers will be shortly following. The public is aware of the  games you 
>are playing and there are those that can be fooled as they also think the 
>sky is falling. The majority of us are awake and well. Our eyes are open 
>and we will be voting no. The Trails can go ahead and rezone their land. 
>They can go ahead and make improvements and profit by their efforts. On 
>their dime. Not mine. The Trails should be smart enough to set aside some 
>land for an elementary school because when they build homes on their 500 
>plus acres there will be enough children in those homes to support one. 
>Just think. Infrastructure already in. A well thought out plan might be an 
>elementary, junior high and high school all on the same acreage. Let them 
>build and get the homes and infrastructure laid out and paid for first. On 
>their dime. Not ours. Then the scho!
>  ols will
>become a selling point for the rest of their projects. The property taxes 
>coming in from those homes will support the schools and not be a burden on 
>the rest of us. This is prudent and smart growth.
>
>Phil Roderick
>
>
>_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯