[Vision2020] A question for the lovely and talented Joan aka Auntie or any other writing type people on this forum

[Bill London]

Though I am not now, nor have ever been, the "lovely and talented" Auntie
Establishment, I am responding:

I understood that Doug et al planned to do more than reissue his "Southern
Slavery As It Was" booklet.  He wants to purge some of the more incendiary
rhetoric, totally brainless arguments, and blatant plagarism from the
original and then add piles of self-serving babble about how he is not a
racist and loves everyone.  The result would be a different booklet, and as
such, a different title is appropriate.
BL




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy Rigsby" <timo5277 at uidaho.edu>
To: <Vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:28 PM
Subject: [Vision2020] A question for the lovely and talented Joan aka Auntie
or any other writing type people on this forum


> Ms. Joan or any other authors on this forum, Bill London included:
>
> I noticed that Moscow's favorite Neo-Con Christian author is re-releasing
his book
> (can't italicize of underline here) Southern Slavery as it Was that he
> co-authored/edited.  I see that he has changed the title from Southern
Slavery to
> either Black and Tan or Regenerate but Unreconstructed.  Is this a common
thing for
> a writer to do when they re-release a second edition of a book?  I know
that with
> college textbooks, when they change editions, the title generally stays
the same.
>
> Could you provide some insight from a well-versed writer on the norm of a
new edition
> of a book like Southern Slavery?
>
> Tim
>
> P.S. We still have yet to meet and frankly I am kind of bummed.  Also,
keep writing,
> you post such thought provoking emails on this forum.
>
>
> _____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>