[Vision2020] question 2

[cjs]

Tom - thank you for chiming in.  These questions are posted to anyone listening that can answer them. I don't care who they are. Keely or not. All Ms. Mix needs to do is direct me to the appropropriate party if she does not know the answer. Again - I ask where the proper authority is? We all know Keely is unpaid but she has been very active in this debate on this forum from the beginning. Can you tell me the appropriate people I should be asking Tom? Off list you suggested I contact CQE. Off list I told you, I did. I am aware of many others who have asked there to. So, if your recomendation of asking CQE questions is not happening, what then would you suggest?

The reason I kepp "airing and airing and airing" the same question "over and over and over" is because the question is not being answered. It is danced around. Can you answer any questions that have not been answered here today? Can you direct the people where they can go to get these answers? Do not say CQE. Too many people are frustrated with out getting return calls or phone nubers.

Tom - I am not airing anything against Ms Mix. She has been in this debate from the beginning. NO ONE ELSE IS HERE FOR HER! Tell ya what. How about a name and phone number of the person you contacted at CQE that was able to answer your question? Immaturity. no. Frustration, yes. 

You speak of "unfounded allegations." Enlighten me Tom.

Phil Roderick


-----Original message-----
From: "Tom Hansen" thansen at moscow.com
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:09:21 -0700
To: "'cjs'" cjs at turbonet.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] question 2

> Visionaires -
> 
> Those questions posed to Ms. Keely Mix by Mr. Phil Roderick have been
> answered to the best of Ms. Mix's knowledge and ability.  Those questions
> that Ms. Mix were unable to answer, primarily due to her limited scope as an
> elected (unpaid) trustee, were requested that Mr. Phil Roderick submit these
> questions to appropriate agencies/personnel.  I personally provided e-mail
> addresses and links to Mr. Roderick for which he could submit his inquiries
> (TWICE).
> 
> Other V2020 subscribers, whose knowledge/expertise has been shown to be
> sufficient, have been so kind as to publicly answer many of the questions
> posed to them by Mr. Roderick.
> 
> Yet, Mr. Roderick not only persists in airing these same questions within
> the V2020 venue, without having attempted to contact the appropriate
> agencies or personnel (which I have managed to contact), he continues to
> publicly air his unfounded accusations/allegations against Ms. Mix.
> 
> Mr. Roderick: Your behavior does not reflect a sense of "community", which
> is imperative in these matters concerning the school bond, it merely
> uncovers a strong sense of immaturity.
> 
> Over these past few weeks, a period in which the V2020 listserve could have
> been better utilized as a school bond "bulletin board", Mr. Roderick's
> (among others) name-calling and unfounded allegations have prevented that
> from happening.
> 
> We can only hope that calmer, more responsible minds will prevail on Tuesday
> and we can celebrate a new, brighter future for our children and the great
> city of Moscow.
> 
> Until then . . .
> 
> Take care of yourselves and each other.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> We could learn a lot from crayons: some are sharp, some are pretty, some are
> dull, some have weird names, and all are different colors....but they all
> exist very nicely in the same box. 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯