[Spam] RE: [Vision2020] Does anybody know?

[keely emerinemix]

Phil, I said we would not build the building in any flood plain that would 
exist.  I am not misinforming the public, and I would remind you that the 
Trail family has offered 40 acres -- the exact situate of which has yet to 
be determined, partially because of concerns that you site.

If I said "there is no floodplain now or ever anywhere near the proposed 
site and its eventual, specific,  40 acres," then I was wrong.  I believe, 
though, that I've made my point clear, and that is that we would not build a 
high school on a portion of land likely to cause flooding in a building.  
Fortunately, architects, planners and engineers much more knowledgeable than 
you or I are studying the issue.

I realize you're going to keep going on this, and I'm sorry if I haven't 
been clear or if I haven't answered questions to your satisfaction.  I 
think, though, that you and I will have to agree to disagree on this, and I 
hope to meet you at the Open House/Trail Presentation on Saturday.

keely



From: "Shelly" <CJs at Turbonet.com>
To: <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Subject: Re: [Spam] RE: [Vision2020] Does anybody know?
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:08:08 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time)

Keeley - you are right. According to the county assessors office the Trail
property does not have any wetlands. Now you are mis-informing the public
when you say it is not in a flood plain. According to the county assessors
office there are indeed many acres in "the 100 year flood plain." They also
informed me that to get out of the flood plain area you would need to build
at 2,620 feet. For which out of the 40 acres is half of the land is above
2620 which makes it safe to build. So what good is the other half? Fly
fishing?

Phil

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963