[Vision2020] Saudi Arabia: Free and Fair Elections?
Tbertruss at aol.com
Tbertruss at aol.com
Mon Sep 27 10:46:14 PDT 2004
Sunil et. al.
One of the idealistic ostensible goals of the US occupation and war in Iraq
is to bring a stable democracy to Iraq, to bring them "freedom," a word which
means what? If they want to have an Islamic government where Islam is the
ruling religion, then if we offer them "freedom," why do we not allow them to
choose this? And if they resist the western style democracy we are trying to
establish, is it morally right for the US to kill those who resist our goals in
the name of "freedom?" How ironic that as the US attempts to pacify the warring
factions in Iraq, we resort to brutality and abuse which are the very
conditions we claimed to be saving them from. There was a reason why Saddam was a
brutal dictator besides lust for power, sadism and corruption. It was a means
of holding a country together with factions ready to incite civil war.
While the Bush administration paints the insurgents as foreign terrorists,
many are Iraqis people who are resisting a foreign power occupying their country
by force. We would do the same! And the Sunnis will not accept rule by the
Shiite, which is what may happen with the majority Shiite likely to be mostly
in control of a so called "democratic" Iraq. Get ready for US Iraq occupation
of Iraq to extend for decades!
But really, many Iraqis know why we are there: we want their oil. How
obvious. Yet this rationale seems to be forgotten in this election year with the
idealistic talk of bringing democracy to the world, stopping terrorism, etc. I
read a quote from a resistance fighter who said just that, that the "US
cowboys want to steal our oil." And I have yet to hear a good counter argument put
forward when it is pointed out that Saudi Arabia has a fundamentalist Islamic
dictatorship that denies human rights, treats women as virtual slaves, yet as
long as Saudi oil flows with guarantees to the West, are we bombing them to
establish freedom and democracy? Why do we not hear from the Bush
administration a cry for Saudi Arabia to have free and fair elections, to free their women
from the oppression they are under, a life that American's would find
appalling? And if we show tacit support for the oppression in Saudi Arabia as long as
the oil flows our way, then should we not question whether freedom and
democracy is our real goal in Iraq? Or is it future guaranteed access to the second
highest known oil reserves of any country in the world, with a military
presence in the heart of the middle east to protect the oil?
This is so obvious I feel silly pointing it out.
Ted Moffett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20040927/7cafc9bc/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list