[Vision2020] Removing Saddam Increased Al Quada's Power
Tbertruss at aol.com
Tbertruss at aol.com
Sat Jun 19 12:23:46 PDT 2004
All:
What a charade!
If "contacts" between Al Quada and representatives of a nation are a reason
to invade and bomb that country into submission, the US would be a target. The
US has had "contacts" with Al Quada.
Regardless of what the White House is saying now, they deliberately gave the
impression to the American people that Iraq had something to do with 9/11, and
the American people bought it, with a majority at one point thinking Iraq was
linked to 9/11.
But it was known years ago that Bin Laden and his followers disliked Saddam
and the form of secularized Islam he represented, in a similar fashion to how
much Al Quada disliked Khadafy in Libya. At one point the British and Al Quada
were working together to get Khadafy, the British in part because Khadafy
threw out the British and nationalized the oil, and Al Quada because Khadafy was
against the purist form of Islam Al Quada promotes.
It was known long ago that 9/11 was not linked to Saddam's regime. How many
times can people overlook the fact that 15 of the 19 9/11 high jackers were
Saudi nationals? How many times can people overlook the funding of Al Quada
that originated from Saudi Arabia?
The US invasion of Iraq is just what Al Quada wanted to inspire their
movement and gain new recruits, to prove to other Muslims that the US wants to
control the Muslim world, so they could continue with aggressive efforts against the
US influence in that region.
The irony is that now that Saddam is gone, Al Quada has more influence in
Iraq! When Saddam was in power, Al Quada's presence in Iraq was kept under
control, with Saddam and Al Quada as enemies.
And this report by the 9/11 commission is old news!
Ted Moffett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20040619/58e45ffa/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list