[Vision2020] Latest Nader News
Tim Lohrmann
timlohr@yahoo.com
Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
--0-777424834-1086115439=:15707
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Looks as if the key good news in this article is that the Greens apparently intend to go ahead and nominate Ralph for their ballot line.
TL
From The Weekly Standard
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:28:51 -0400
Article URL is http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/141ycmff.asp
Nader's Run
Don't look now--Ralph Nader is doing even better than he was at this point in 2000.
by Matthew Continetti
06/01/2004 12:00:00 AM
Increase Font Size
Printer-Friendly
Email a Friend
Respond to this article
IT HAD ALL THE TRAPPINGS of an international summit. By the time Ralph Nader visited Senator John Kerry at the Democrat's campaign headquarters on May 19, the meeting had been hyped for days. Washington salivated in anticipation. Reporters huddled outside Kerry HQ looked as though they had been transported miraculously to Yalta, 1945, waiting patiently for Roosevelt to shake hands with Stalin.
The Washington summit wasn't as cozy as Yalta. Photos show the tall, ragged Nader shaking hands with the tall, blow-dried Kerry. Look at them and you see Nader wearing a plaintive, satisfied look on his face. Not Kerry. His eyes are open wide, and his smile exaggerated, frozen in place. The man looks scared.
Here's why. When Nader entered the race this year, he had little money, little support, and no ballot access. His name wasn't on the ballot in a single state, which was a far cry from 2000, when he was on the ballot in 43 states and Washington, DC. But on May 13 the Reform party endorsed and explicitly nominated Nader, which could put him on the ballot in seven states, including Florida. Richard Winger, the editor of Ballot Access News, says that because the Reform party is in shambles, it's more likely the party's nomination will put Nader on the ballot in just three states: Mississippi, where the Reform party's national chairman, Sean O'Hara, resides; Colorado, where anyone can get on the ballot for $500; and Florida.
And you can probably add Texas to that list. Nader has hB=10intMinVersion=1DoOn Error Resume NextFb=(IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash." & hB)))If Fb=true Then Exit DohB=hB-1Loop While hB>=intMinVersion Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_xp='';Ads_yp='';Ads_opt=0;Ads_wrd='[KeyWord]';Ads_prf='';Ads_par='';Ads_cnturl='';Ads_sec=0;
sued the state for unfair ballot access laws. In Texas, independent presidential candidates need 64,000 signatures to get on the ballot. This week Nader campaign staff delivered 80,045 signatures to the Texas statehouse. The problem is that they were two weeks late. Nader's suit, which would strike down the May 10 deadline and get Nader on the Texas ballot, is pending, with a hearing scheduled for July. Experts say it's likely Nader will win.
Nader has the Green party to fall back on, too. Both Peter Camejo in California and Carol Miller in New Mexico, powerful Green party members, want their party to nominate Nader. We'll know if they're successful sometime between June 24 and 28, when the Green party holds its convention in Milwaukee. A Green party nomination would give Nader ballot access in at least 23 states. "It would take half the load off" the Nader campaign, Winger says.
"The press tends to think it's harder than it is" to get on the ballot, he adds. A libertarian presidential candidate was on the ballot in all 50 states in 1992, 1996, and 2000. In 1988 Lenora Fulani and the New Alliance party was on the ballot in all 50 states. And Ross Perot was on all 50 ballots in 1992 and 1996.
Right now Nader is focused on ballot access in the most difficult states. That will change. "They've been totally ignoring the easy states," Winger says. It only takes 800 signatures to get on the ballot in New Jersey, for example. In Tennessee it's 275. Arkansas, 1,000. "There's going to be a huge increase" once Nader shifts his focus to these states.
NADER DOES have one problem. He doesn't have much money. According to the FEC, as of April 30 Nader had raised $1,178,947 for his independent run. But he's also spent $1,302,841. Plus, he's $24,950 in debt. Which leaves him with $181,345 in cash on hand.
But compare that number with what Nader had in 2000. Reports filed with the FEC show that Nader had $67,189.47 in cash on hand as of April 30, 2000. In other words, Nader is in better financial shape this year.
He can take additional solace from the polls. In a March Newsweek poll, 12 percent of 18-29 year olds said they preferred Nader over either a Republican or Democrat. An April poll showed Nader running at 8 percent in Pennsylvania, up from 7 percent in March. A May Fox News poll had Nader at 3 percent, with Kerry and Bush tied 40-40. But this week's Quinnipiac poll has Nader at 6 percent. Also, a USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll of registered voters also had Nader at 6 percent, down from 7 percent at the beginning of the month. Those numbers, too, are similar to Nader's in 2000. An April 2000 Gallup poll had Nader at 4 percent, for example.
(The Nader poll number that has changed significantly from 2000, incidentally, is his favorable/unfavorable rating. In April 2000 Gallup showed Nader with a 41 percent favorable rating and a 20 percent unfavorable rating. But an April 2004 CBS poll shows Nader with only an 11 percent favorable rating and a 31 percent hB=10intMinVersion=1DoOn Error Resume NextFb=(IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash." & hB)))If Fb=true Then Exit DohB=hB-1Loop While hB>=intMinVersion Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_xp='';Ads_yp='';Ads_opt=0;Ads_wrd='[KeyWord]';Ads_prf='';Ads_par='';Ads_cnturl='';Ads_sec=0;
unfavorable.)
All in all, it's not a bad situation for Nader. And yet skeptics like to dismiss his influence this year. They remind us that Nader polled at 6-7 percent up until Election Day 2000, but ended up with less than 3 percent of the national vote. The skeptics miss the point. Nader's less than 3 percent of the national vote in 2000 might have cost Gore the election. So it's no surprise the cognoscenti saw last week's summit as a sign that the Kerry campaign was worried about Nader's influence this year. That Nader is performing about as well as he was at this point in 2000 gives Democrats reason to worry.
Matthew Continetti is a reporter at The Weekly Standard.
____________________________________________________________
Brought to you by weeklystandard.com http://www.weeklystandard.com/
To subscribe to The Weekly Standard, go to https://www.neodata.com/ITPS2.cgi?
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
--0-777424834-1086115439=:15707
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<DIV>Looks as if the key good news in this article is that the Greens apparently intend to go ahead and nominate Ralph for their ballot line.</DIV>
<DIV> TL<BR><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> From The Weekly Standard<BR>Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:28:51 -0400<BR>Article URL is <A href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/141ycmff.asp">http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/141ycmff.asp</A><BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=760 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top width=500>
<P><SPAN class=head></SPAN> </P>
<P><FONT size=2><SPAN class=head>Nader's Run</SPAN> <BR><SPAN class=deck>Don't look now--Ralph Nader is doing even better than he was at this point in 2000.</SPAN> <BR>by Matthew Continetti <BR>06/01/2004 12:00:00 AM </FONT></P></TD>
<TD width=10><FONT size=2><IMG height=1 src="http://www.weeklystandard.com/images/spacer.gif" width=10></FONT></TD>
<TD vAlign=top width=250>
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>
<!-- //
function printPreview() {
var ArticlePreview = window.open('/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=4141&R=9E9922E68', 'ArticlePreview', 'status=no,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,width=630,height=470' );
ArticlePreview.focus();
}
// -->
</SCRIPT>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width=250 bgColor=#000000 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width=248 bgColor=#ffffff border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=238 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=center align=right width=29><A href="javascript:LargeFont('ZOOM');"><FONT size=2><IMG height=17 alt="Larger type view" src="http://www.weeklystandard.com/images/magnifier.gif" width=20 align=absMiddle border=0></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></TD>
<TD vAlign=center width=90>
<P><SPAN class=small><A href="javascript:LargeFont('ZOOM');"><FONT size=2>Increase Font Size</FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right width=29><A href="javascript:printPreview();"><FONT size=2><IMG height=20 src="http://www.weeklystandard.com/images/icon_printer.gif" width=20 align=absMiddle border=0></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></TD>
<TD vAlign=center width=90>
<P><SPAN class=small><A href="javascript:printPreview();"><FONT size=2>Printer-Friendly</FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></SPAN></P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=2><FONT size=2><BR></FONT></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=center align=right width=29><A href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/EMF/EmailFriend.asp"><FONT size=2><IMG height=20 src="http://www.weeklystandard.com/images/icon_email.gif" width=29 align=absMiddle border=0></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></TD>
<TD vAlign=center width=90>
<P><SPAN class=small><A href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/EMF/EmailFriend.asp"><FONT size=2>Email a Friend</FONT></A></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD vAlign=center align=right width=29><A href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/misc/Respond.asp?idArticle=4141"><FONT size=2><IMG height=20 src="http://www.weeklystandard.com/images/icon_reply.gif" width=28 align=absMiddle border=0></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></TD>
<TD vAlign=center width=90>
<P><SPAN class=small><A href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/misc/Respond.asp?idArticle=4141"><FONT size=2>Respond to this article</FONT></A></SPAN></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=760 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top width=625>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width="98%" border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=2></FONT>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top align=left>
<P><FONT size=2>IT HAD ALL THE TRAPPINGS of an international summit. By the time Ralph Nader visited Senator John Kerry at the Democrat's campaign headquarters on May 19, the meeting had been hyped for days. Washington salivated in anticipation. Reporters huddled outside Kerry HQ looked as though they had been transported miraculously to Yalta, 1945, waiting patiently for Roosevelt to shake hands with Stalin.</FONT>
<P><FONT size=2>The Washington summit wasn't as cozy as Yalta. Photos show the tall, ragged Nader shaking hands with the tall, blow-dried Kerry. Look at them and you see Nader wearing a plaintive, satisfied look on his face. Not Kerry. His eyes are open wide, and his smile exaggerated, frozen in place. The man looks scared.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Here's why. When Nader entered the race this year, he had little money, little support, and no ballot access. His name wasn't on the ballot in a single state, which was a far cry from 2000, when he was on the ballot in 43 states and Washington, DC. But on May 13 the Reform party endorsed and explicitly nominated Nader, which could put him on the ballot in seven states, including Florida. Richard Winger, the editor of <I>Ballot Access News</I>, says that because the Reform party is in shambles, it's more likely the party's nomination will put Nader on the ballot in just three states: Mississippi, where the Reform party's national chairman, Sean O'Hara, resides; Colorado, where anyone can get on the ballot for $500; and Florida.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>And you can probably add Texas to that list. Nader has </FONT>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 align=left border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><!-- BEGIN: AdSolution-Tag 4.1: Global-Code [PLACE IN HTML-HEAD-AREA!] -->
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/dlv/aslmain.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=VBScript>
hB=10
intMinVersion=1
Do
On Error Resume Next
Fb=(IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash." & hB)))
If Fb=true Then Exit Do
hB=hB-1
Loop While hB>=intMinVersion
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/dlv/aslsubs111.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<!-- END: AdSolution-Tag 4.1: Global-Code --><!-- BEGIN: AdSolution-Website-Tag 4.1 : weeklystandard.com / ROS_Exp_Rect_Box_300x250_250x250 -->
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript type=text/javascript>
Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_xp='';Ads_yp='';Ads_opt=0;Ads_wrd='[KeyWord]';Ads_prf='';Ads_par='';Ads_cnturl='';Ads_sec=0;
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/njf/41/weeklystandard.com/ros_exp_rect_box_300x250_250x250.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<A onmouseover="self.status='Falk AdSolution';return true;" onmouseout="self.status='';return true;" href="http://red01.as-us.falkag.net/red?cmd=url&&rdm=52649287&dlv=41,3590,31388,99999999,99999999&kid=99999999&chw=910953-&tcs=&dmn=1Cust91.tnt1.pullman.wa.da.uu.net&scx=1024&scy=768&scc=32&jav=1&sta=,,,,6,,,,en-us,&iid=31388&bid=99999999&dat=http%3A//www.falkag.de" target=_blank><FONT size=2><IMG id=Ads_img31388 height=1 alt="Falk AdSolution" src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/bgf/trpix.gif" width=1 border=0 name=Ads_img31388></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT>
<DIV id=Ads_Count31388 style="DISPLAY: none; LEFT: 0px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 0px"><FONT size=2><IMG height=1 src="http://red01.as-us.falkag.net/dat/bgf/trpix.gif?&rdm=52649287&dlv=41,3590,31388,99999999,99999999&kid=99999999&chw=910953-&tcs=&dmn=1Cust91.tnt1.pullman.wa.da.uu.net&scx=1024&scy=768&scc=32&jav=1&sta=,,,,6,,,,en-us,&iid=31388&bid=99999999" width=1></FONT></DIV><!-- END:AdSolution-Tag 4.1 --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><FONT size=2>sued the state for unfair ballot access laws. In Texas, independent presidential candidates need 64,000 signatures to get on the ballot. This week Nader campaign staff delivered 80,045 signatures to the Texas statehouse. The problem is that they were two weeks late. Nader's suit, which would strike down the May 10 deadline and get Nader on the Texas ballot, is pending, with a hearing scheduled for July. Experts say it's likely Nader will win.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Nader has the Green party to fall back on, too. Both Peter Camejo in California and Carol Miller in New Mexico, powerful Green party members, want their party to nominate Nader. We'll know if they're successful sometime between June 24 and 28, when the Green party holds its convention in Milwaukee. A Green party nomination would give Nader ballot access in at least 23 states. "It would take half the load off" the Nader campaign, Winger says.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>"The press tends to think it's harder than it is" to get on the ballot, he adds. A libertarian presidential candidate was on the ballot in all 50 states in 1992, 1996, and 2000. In 1988 Lenora Fulani and the New Alliance party was on the ballot in all 50 states. And Ross Perot was on all 50 ballots in 1992 and 1996. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Right now Nader is focused on ballot access in the most difficult states. That will change. "They've been totally ignoring the easy states," Winger says. It only takes 800 signatures to get on the ballot in New Jersey, for example. In Tennessee it's 275. Arkansas, 1,000. "There's going to be a huge increase" once Nader shifts his focus to these states.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>NADER DOES have one problem. He doesn't have much money. According to the FEC, as of April 30 Nader had raised $1,178,947 for his independent run. But he's also spent $1,302,841. Plus, he's $24,950 in debt. Which leaves him with $181,345 in cash on hand.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>But compare that number with what Nader had in 2000. Reports filed with the FEC show that Nader had $67,189.47 in cash on hand as of April 30, 2000. In other words, Nader is in better financial shape this year.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>He can take additional solace from the polls. In a March <I>Newsweek</I> poll, 12 percent of 18-29 year olds said they preferred Nader over either a Republican or Democrat. An April poll showed Nader running at 8 percent in Pennsylvania, up from 7 percent in March. A May Fox News poll had Nader at 3 percent, with Kerry and Bush tied 40-40. But this week's Quinnipiac poll has Nader at 6 percent. Also, a <I>USA Today</I>/CNN/Gallup poll of registered voters also had Nader at 6 percent, down from 7 percent at the beginning of the month. Those numbers, too, are similar to Nader's in 2000. An April 2000 Gallup poll had Nader at 4 percent, for example.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>(The Nader poll number that <I>has</I> changed significantly from 2000, incidentally, is his favorable/unfavorable rating. In April 2000 Gallup showed Nader with a 41 percent favorable rating and a 20 percent unfavorable rating. But an April 2004 CBS poll shows Nader with only an 11 percent favorable rating and a 31 percent </FONT>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 align=left border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><!-- BEGIN: AdSolution-Tag 4.1: Global-Code [PLACE IN HTML-HEAD-AREA!] -->
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/dlv/aslmain.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=VBScript>
hB=10
intMinVersion=1
Do
On Error Resume Next
Fb=(IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash." & hB)))
If Fb=true Then Exit Do
hB=hB-1
Loop While hB>=intMinVersion
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/dlv/aslsubs111.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<!-- END: AdSolution-Tag 4.1: Global-Code --><!-- BEGIN: AdSolution-Website-Tag 4.1 : weeklystandard.com / ROS_Exp_Rect_Box_300x250_250x250 -->
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript type=text/javascript>
Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_xp='';Ads_yp='';Ads_opt=0;Ads_wrd='[KeyWord]';Ads_prf='';Ads_par='';Ads_cnturl='';Ads_sec=0;
</SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/njf/41/weeklystandard.com/ros_exp_rect_box_300x250_250x250.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>
<A onmouseover="self.status='Falk AdSolution';return true;" onmouseout="self.status='';return true;" href="http://red01.as-us.falkag.net/red?cmd=url&&rdm=95062208&dlv=41,3590,31388,99999999,99999999&kid=99999999&chw=910953-&tcs=&dmn=1Cust91.tnt1.pullman.wa.da.uu.net&scx=1024&scy=768&scc=32&jav=1&sta=,,,,6,,,,en-us,&iid=31388&bid=99999999&dat=http%3A//www.falkag.de" target=_blank><FONT size=2><IMG id=Ads_img31388 height=1 alt="Falk AdSolution" src="http://a.as-us.falkag.net/dat/bgf/trpix.gif" width=1 border=0 name=Ads_img31388></FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT>
<DIV id=Ads_Count31388 style="DISPLAY: none; LEFT: 0px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 0px"><FONT size=2><IMG height=1 src="http://red01.as-us.falkag.net/dat/bgf/trpix.gif?&rdm=95062208&dlv=41,3590,31388,99999999,99999999&kid=99999999&chw=910953-&tcs=&dmn=1Cust91.tnt1.pullman.wa.da.uu.net&scx=1024&scy=768&scc=32&jav=1&sta=,,,,6,,,,en-us,&iid=31388&bid=99999999" width=1></FONT></DIV><!-- END:AdSolution-Tag 4.1 --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><FONT size=2>unfavorable.)</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>All in all, it's not a bad situation for Nader. And yet skeptics like to dismiss his influence this year. They remind us that Nader polled at 6-7 percent up until Election Day 2000, but ended up with less than 3 percent of the national vote. The skeptics miss the point. Nader's less than 3 percent of the national vote in 2000 might have cost Gore the election. So it's no surprise the cognoscenti saw last week's summit as a sign that the Kerry campaign was worried about Nader's influence this year. That Nader is performing about as well as he was at this point in 2000 gives Democrats reason to worry.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT>
<P><I><FONT size=2>Matthew Continetti is a reporter at The Weekly Standard.</FONT></I></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>____________________________________________________________<BR>Brought to you by weeklystandard.com http://www.weeklystandard.com/<BR>To subscribe to The Weekly Standard, go to https://www.neodata.com/ITPS2.cgi?</BLOCKQUOTE><p>
<hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>Friends. Fun. <a href="http://messenger.yahoo.com/">Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger</a>
--0-777424834-1086115439=:15707--