[Vision2020] RE: LOS aka Lost Our Slaves (Yes, this is long, but packed with info and li

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:21:04 -0800

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C3DE75.F2144360
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This reminds me of another observation that I would like to run by you
folks.

It seems that many of you are unable to distinguish without separating. For
example last week you told me that rape was not a sexual crime because it
was a violent crime. I can understand that the disciplines of law and
medicine need to make workable definitions and they aren't allowed to make
laws pertaining to sexual habits, but that doesn't mean that rape, apart
from the legal and medical definitions, isn't a sexual act as well as a
violent act. 

And again, in the letter below, it seems that a guy can't agree with 90% of
what another guy thinks without agreeing with everything a guy thinks. Isn't
this like saying that because someone likes Bill Clinton, he also likes
adultery and immorality? After all, Clinton has never been known as a
faithful man, therefore everyone who likes him is also immoral.

Again, my question is: Why can't a person support Bill Clinton without being
immoral like Bill is? Or why can't rape be both a violent act and a sexual
act?

I know these are simple questions, but some of us are simple people.

Mike Lawyer

  _____  

From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] On
Behalf Of DonaldH675@aol.com
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 9:14 PM
To: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] RE: LOS aka Lost Our Slaves (Yes, this is long, but
packed with info and li

 Visionaries:

In a heroic effort to explain the League of the South to his followers, Doug
wrote this explanatory note. I thank the brave friend who shared this with
me.

"In the midst of our current controversy with our local intoleristas, some
of you may  have wondered about the League of  the South, and what our
connection to that organization actually is. Steve Wilkins, whom you know,
has served as a director for the organization. When the group was first
formed Steve told them a couple things that bear on our situation here.
First, he said the group had to be explicitly Christian or he could not be
associated with it. He also told them that it could not be racist in any
way, 

and if anything like that showed up, he was out of there. Steve has recently
resigned from their board of directors, but *not* because there was any
problem with the conditions above."

(V2020 readers may find this ironic, but I have corrected the typo(s)).
Steve Wilkins has been sitting on the Board of Directors for a mighty long
time - approximately 10 years. During that decade he has, presumably, spend
a considerable amount of time with the President of the LOS, J. Michael
Hill. Dr. Hill authored the following (edited for length) position paper
which is linked to the LOS homepage. 

<http://www.dixienet.org/> Click on the section at the top called "Reading"
and then clip on "position papers."

A Call for Proportionality, Honesty, Integrity, Morality and an End to
Demagoguery A League of the South Position Paper 

by Dr Michael Hill, LS President

"We were born on the same soil, live on the same land, and why should we not
be brothers and sisters?" --Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest addressing the black
community of Memphis at the city Fairgrounds, July 5, 1875

(Interjected note from Rose) This would be the same Nathan Bedford Forrest
who founded the Ku Klux Klan and was the commanding officer during the Fort
Pillow Massacre which "proved the ugliest racial incident of the war,
Confederate forces under General Nathan B. Forrest captured Fort Pillow on
April 12, 1864, and proceeded to wipe out the black troops within; some were
burned or buried alive. A Federal congressional investigating committee
subsequently verified that more than 300 blacks, including women and
children, had been slain after the fort surrendered. After the incident,
black soldiers going into battle used the cry "Remember Fort Pillow!" Later
in the year, the South agreed to treat blacks as prisoners of war."
<http://search.eb.com/blackhistory/micro/215/82.html>
http://search.eb.com/blackhistory/micro/215/82.html

(Is it just me, or, would most of us avoid quoting Nathan Forrest if we
intended to publish a position paper on race issues?  But, I digress. Let's
turn back to words of J. Michael Hill.)

".Each time the League leadership addresses itself to the issue of race, the
policy we advance must be free of hatred and malice. This has been our
position from the start.  Though many blacks may be taught to hate us in
their homes and institutions, our response to them must be grounded in
Christian charity.  Now, some will surely see this as a sign of weakness,
but if you do it's because you simply dont understand the tenets of the
Christian faith.  No less a man than Rev. Robert Lewis Dabney noted over a
century ago that Southern whites recognised an obligation to treat Christian
blacks (slave and free) as brothers in Christ, and to recognise their common
humanity (original sin, all created in God's image, etc.).  Moreover, all
(except those convicted of felonious offenses) should have their lives,
liberties, and property protected by the civil magistrate. 

This does not mean, however, that we must subscribe to the flawed Jacobin
notion of egalitarianism, nor does it mean that white Southerners should
give control over their civilisation and its institutions to another race,
whether it be native blacks or Hispanic immigrants.  Nowhere, outside of
liberal dogma, is any nation called upon to commit cultural and ethnic
suicide.   Furthermore, our surrender would ultimately be regretted by all
parties as the remaining liberties were squandered by those who had no
desire to preserve the Eurocentric, (and therefore "racist"), institution of
the rule of law. 

Let us in the League, then, confidently defend our ethnic, cultural, and
religious heritage.  After all, we have as much right to do this as anyone.
Let us also not fall prey to the notion that any other group besides
ourselves could (or would) defend and preserve the biblically-based rule of
law that has undergirded our Southern society since its formation.
Undoubtedly, the liberal and neo-conservative pundits will attempt to smear
us as "racists" because we stand up for ourselves and our posterity.  This
is, regrettably, unavoidable because we are confronted by fundamentally
dishonourable and dishonest people who substitute the ad hominem attack for
rational debate.  Therefore, we are obliged to develop thick hides to fend
off the attacks that will inevitably come. 

But at the same time, we will loudly proclaim that we will have no truck
with those who wish to interject malice and hatred into the racial issue,
and that includes both sides, black and white.  Being proud and thankful of
who we are does not mean that we must denigrate others.  But let us always
speak the truth about race (as well as all other things) no matter how
uncomfortable it may be or how politically incorrect it is. 

For instance, League member and syndicated columnist Charley Reese noted in
a recent column that black-on-white crime has reached epidemic proportions
(e.g. 100 white rapes against blacks in 1994 as compared to over 20,000
black rapes against whites).  Reese writes: "This huge disparity between
white-on-black and black-on-white crime is the elephant at the tea party
that both the press and the federal government pretend they can't see. They
are vile hypocrites."   Well said, Charley.  

Such hypocrisy is guaranteed to fuel white resentment, but we must not allow
ourselves to be pulled into the vortex of hatred and violence to "settle the
score."  Rather, we should speak the unvarnished truth and continue to work
positively for the interests of our own people.  And of course this means
protecting ourselves when necessary, individually and collectively. 

Today's white Christian Southerners are the blood descendants of the men and
women who settled this country and gave us the blessings of freedom and
prosperity.  To give away this inheritance in the name of   "equality" or
"fairness" would be unconscionable.  As the progeny of Lee, Jackson,
Forrest, and Davis, let us summon the courage to defend what the God of the
ages has given us.  No one else will do it for us. 

Dr Michael Hill
LS President 

(Rose again) If that's not enough nuttiness from J. Michael Hill, and the
crackpot crime reports of Charlie Reese, read on for a brief piece of
non-history again from Dr. Hill

"On Defending the Anglo-Celtic Culture of the South: 

The League seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core culture of the
South because the Scots, Irish, Welsh, and English have given Dixie its
unique institutions and civilisation.  Should the Christian, Anglo-Celtic
core be displaced, then the South would cease to be recognisable to us and
our progeny.  We must maintain this all-important link to our European
heritage from which we have drawn our inspiration.   Anglo-Celtic
Southerners and their European cousins have a duty to protect that which our
ancestors bequeathed us. If we will not promote our own interests, no one
will do it for us." http://www.dixienet.org/positions/free-ac.htm

Rose Note:  What is it about revisionist history and Neo-Cons? For an
accurate, readable, debunking of the myth of Anglo-Celtic heritage in the
South please read: Oxford American, Sept.-Oct. 1999, pp. 24 - 30, by Diane
Roberts English professor at the University of Alabama. Published by Oxford
American, P.O. Box 1156, Oxford, Mississippi.  Or, email me and I will
forward my copy.  And by the way, I did not correct Dr. Hill's typos.  

The point of my email is this.  I conclude that  Steve Wilkins' long and
voluntary association with J. Michael Hill, indicates his agreement with
Michael Hill's writings. I wonder what, if anything, it would take for him
to identify someone or thing racist?  I also wonder if resigning his
directorship means that he also resigned his membership?  Somehow, I doubt
it.  

Rose Huskey

PS  I suppose anyone who wishes to read more about Doug's position on the
LOS organization  - which he "mildly supports" but did not join - could stop
by the Christ Church office or email Doug directly and ask for a copy.

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C3DE75.F2144360
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"
xmlns:ns0=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns:ns1=3D"">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType
 namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" =
name=3D"State"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"Street"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"PlaceName"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"PlaceType"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"address"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"City"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"place"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"PersonName"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p
	{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
	margin-right:0in;
	mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
	margin-left:0in;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:Arial;
	color:navy;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dblue>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>This reminds me of another =
observation
that I would like to run by you folks.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

It seems that many of you are =
unable to distinguish
without separating. For example last week you told me that rape was not =
a
sexual crime because it was a violent crime. I can understand that the =
disciplines
of law and medicine need to make workable definitions and they =
aren&#8217;t allowed
to make laws pertaining to sexual habits, but that doesn&#8217;t mean =
that rape,
apart from the legal and medical definitions, isn&#8217;t a sexual act =
as well
as a violent act. <o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

And again, in the letter below, it =
seems
that a guy can&#8217;t agree with 90% of what another guy thinks without
agreeing with everything a guy thinks. Isn&#8217;t this like saying that
because someone likes Bill Clinton, he also likes adultery and =
immorality? After
all, <st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Clinton</st1:place></st1:City>
has never been known as a faithful man, therefore everyone who likes him =
is
also immoral.<o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

Again, my question is: Why =
can&#8217;t a
person support Bill Clinton without being immoral like Bill is? Or why =
can&#8217;t
rape be both a violent act and a sexual =
act?<o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I know these are simple questions, =
but
some of us are simple people.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Mike Lawyer</span></font><font =
color=3Dnavy><span
style=3D'color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>=

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>=

</div>

<div>

<div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter =
style=3D'margin-left:.5in;text-align:center'><font
size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>

<hr size=3D2 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter tabindex=3D-1>

</span></font></div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><b><font size=3D2 =
face=3DTahoma><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</spa=
n></font></b><font
size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] =
<b><span
style=3D'font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of =
</span></b>DonaldH675@aol.com<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Friday, January 16, =
2004
9:14 PM<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName =
w:st=3D"on">vision2020@moscow.com</st1:PersonName><br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [Vision2020] RE: =
LOS aka
Lost Our Slaves (Yes, this is long, but packed with info and =
li</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>&nbsp;Visionaries:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p=
>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>In a heroic effort to explain the League of =
the South
to his followers,&nbsp;Doug wrote this explanatory note.&nbsp;I =
thank&nbsp;the
brave&nbsp;friend who&nbsp;shared this =
with&nbsp;me.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

&#8220;In the midst of our current =
controversy with
our local intoleristas, some of you may&nbsp; have wondered about the =
League
of&nbsp; the South, and what our connection to that organization =
actually is.
Steve Wilkins, whom you know, has served as a director for the =
organization.
When the group was first formed Steve told them a couple things that =
bear on
our situation here. First, he said the group had to be explicitly =
Christian or
he could not be associated with it. He also told them that it could not =
be
racist in any way, <o:p></o:p>

and if anything like that showed up, he was =
out of
there. Steve has recently resigned from their board of directors, but =
*not*
because there was any problem with the conditions =
above.&#8221;<o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

(V2020 readers may find this ironic, but I =
have
corrected the typo(s)).&nbsp; Steve Wilkins has been sitting on the =
Board of
Directors for a mighty long time &#8211; approximately 10 years. During =
that
decade he has, presumably, spend a considerable amount of time with the
President of the LOS, J. Michael Hill. Dr. Hill authored the following =
(edited
for length) position paper which is linked to the LOS homepage. =
<o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>&lt;<font color=3Dblack><span =
style=3D'color:black'><a
href=3D"http://www.dixienet.org/">http://www.dixienet.org/</a>&gt; Click =
on the
section at the top called &quot;<st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Reading</st1:place></st1:City>&quot;
and then clip on &quot;position =
papers.&quot;</span></font><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><b><font size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>A Call
for Proportionality, Honesty, Integrity, Morality and an End to =
Demagoguery A
League of the South Position Paper</span></font></b> <o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 =
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>by Dr Michael Hill, LS President<b><font =
color=3Dnavy><span
style=3D'color:navy;font-weight:bold'><o:p></o:p></span></font></b></span=
></font></p>

&quot;We were =
born on the
same soil, live on the same land, and why should we not be brothers and
sisters?&quot; --Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest addressing the black =
community of <st1:City
w:st=3D"on"><st1:place w:st=3D"on">Memphis</st1:place></st1:City> at the =
city
Fairgrounds, July 5, 1875<o:p></o:p>

<p style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>(Interjected note from Rose)&nbsp; This would =
be the
same Nathan Bedford Forrest who founded the Ku Klux Klan and was the =
commanding
officer during the Fort Pillow Massacre which</span> &#8220;proved the =
ugliest
racial incident of the war, Confederate forces under General Nathan B. =
Forrest
captured Fort Pillow on April 12, 1864, and proceeded to wipe out the =
black
troops within; some were burned or buried alive. A Federal congressional
investigating committee subsequently verified that more than 300 blacks, =
including
women and children, had been slain after the fort surrendered. After the
incident, black soldiers going into battle used the cry &quot;Remember =
Fort
Pillow!&quot; Later in the year, the South agreed to treat blacks as =
prisoners
of war.&#8221; </font><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><a =
href=3D"http://search.eb.com/blackhistory/micro/215/82.html"><font
size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New =
Roman"'>http://search.eb.com/blackhistory/micro/215/82.html</span></font>=
</a></span></font>&nbsp;
<font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p=
>

(Is it just me, or, would most of us avoid =
quoting
Nathan Forrest if we intended to publish a position paper on race =
issues?&nbsp;
But, I digress. Let's turn back to words of J. Michael =
Hill.)<o:p></o:p>

&#8220;&#8230;Each time the League leadership addresses itself =
to the
issue of race, the policy we advance must be free of hatred and malice. =
This
has been our position from the start.&nbsp; Though many blacks may be =
taught to
hate us in their homes and institutions, our response to them must be =
grounded
in Christian charity.&nbsp; Now, some will surely see this as a sign of
weakness, but if you do it's because you simply dont understand the =
tenets of
the Christian faith.&nbsp; No less a man than Rev. Robert Lewis Dabney =
noted
over a century ago that Southern whites recognised an obligation to =
treat
Christian blacks (slave and free) as brothers in Christ, and to =
recognise their
common humanity (original sin, all created in God's image, etc.).&nbsp; =
Moreover,
all (except those convicted of felonious offenses) should have their =
lives,
liberties, and property protected by the civil magistrate. =
<o:p></o:p>

This does not mean, however, that we must subscribe to the =
flawed
Jacobin notion of egalitarianism, nor does it mean that white =
Southerners
should give control over their civilisation and its institutions to =
another
race, whether it be native blacks or Hispanic immigrants.&nbsp; Nowhere,
outside of liberal dogma, is any nation called upon to commit cultural =
and
ethnic suicide. &nbsp; Furthermore, our surrender would ultimately be =
regretted
by all parties as the remaining liberties were squandered by those who =
had no
desire to preserve the Eurocentric, (and therefore &quot;racist&quot;),
institution of the rule of law. <o:p></o:p>

Let us in the League, then, confidently defend our ethnic, =
cultural,
and religious heritage.&nbsp; After all, we have as much right to do =
this as
anyone.&nbsp; Let us also not fall prey to the notion that any other =
group
besides ourselves could (or would) defend and preserve the =
biblically-based
rule of law that has undergirded our Southern society since its
formation.&nbsp; Undoubtedly, the liberal and neo-conservative pundits =
will
attempt to smear us as &quot;racists&quot; because we stand up for =
ourselves
and our posterity.&nbsp; This is, regrettably, unavoidable because we =
are
confronted by fundamentally dishonourable and dishonest people who =
substitute
the ad hominem attack for rational debate.&nbsp; Therefore, we are =
obliged to
develop thick hides to fend off the attacks that will inevitably come. =
<o:p></o:p>

But at the same time, we will loudly proclaim that we will have =
no
truck with those who wish to interject malice and hatred into the racial =
issue,
and that includes both sides, black and white.&nbsp; Being proud and =
thankful
of who we are does not mean that we must denigrate others.&nbsp; But let =
us
always speak the truth about race (as well as all other things) no =
matter how
uncomfortable it may be or how politically incorrect it is. =
<o:p></o:p>

For instance, League member and syndicated columnist Charley =
Reese
noted in a recent column that black-on-white crime has reached epidemic
proportions (e.g. 100 white rapes against blacks in 1994 as compared to =
over
20,000 black rapes against whites).&nbsp; Reese writes: &quot;This huge
disparity between white-on-black and black-on-white crime is the =
elephant at
the tea party that both the press and the federal government pretend =
they can't
see. They are vile hypocrites.&quot; &nbsp; Well said, Charley.&nbsp; =
<o:p></o:p>

Such hypocrisy is guaranteed to fuel white resentment, but we =
must not
allow ourselves to be pulled into the vortex of hatred and violence to
&quot;settle the score.&quot;&nbsp; Rather, we should speak the =
unvarnished
truth and continue to work positively for the interests of our own
people.&nbsp; And of course this means protecting ourselves when =
necessary,
individually and collectively. <o:p></o:p>

Today's white Christian Southerners are the blood descendants of =
the
men and women who settled this country and gave us the blessings of =
freedom and
prosperity.&nbsp; To give away this inheritance in the name of &nbsp;
&quot;equality&quot; or &quot;fairness&quot; would be =
unconscionable.&nbsp; As
the progeny of Lee, Jackson, Forrest, and Davis, let us summon the =
courage to
defend what the God of the ages has given us.&nbsp; No one else will do =
it for
us. <o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><b><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>Dr Michael =
Hill</span></font></b><br>
LS President <o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;<font color=3Dblack><span =
style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></font></span></font></p>

(Rose again) If that's not enough
nuttiness from J. Michael Hill, and the crackpot crime reports of =
Charlie
Reese, read on for a brief piece of non-history again from Dr. =
Hill<o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><b><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>&quot;On Defending the =
Anglo-Celtic
Culture of the South:</span></font></b> <o:p></o:p></p>

The League seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core =
culture of the
South because the Scots, Irish, Welsh, and English have given <st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Dixie</st1:place>
its unique institutions and civilisation.&nbsp; Should the Christian,
Anglo-Celtic core be displaced, then the South would cease to be =
recognisable
to us and our progeny.&nbsp; We must maintain this all-important link to =
our
European heritage from which we have drawn our inspiration. &nbsp; =
Anglo-Celtic
Southerners and their European cousins have a duty to protect that which =
our
ancestors bequeathed us. If we will not promote our own interests, no =
one will
do it for us.&quot; <a =
href=3D"http://www.dixienet.org/positions/free-ac.htm">http://www.dixiene=
t.org/positions/free-ac.htm</a><o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

Rose Note:&nbsp; What is it about revisionist history and =
Neo-Cons? For
an accurate, readable, debunking of the myth of Anglo-Celtic heritage in =
the
South please read: Oxford =
American,
Sept.-Oct. 1999, pp. 24 - 30, by Diane Roberts English professor at the =
<st1:place
w:st=3D"on"><st1:PlaceType w:st=3D"on">University</st1:PlaceType> of =
<st1:PlaceName
 w:st=3D"on">Alabama</st1:PlaceName></st1:place>. Published by <st1:City =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:place
 w:st=3D"on">Oxford</st1:place></st1:City> American, <st1:address =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:Street
 w:st=3D"on">P.O. Box 1156</st1:Street>, <st1:City =
w:st=3D"on">Oxford</st1:City>, <st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">Mississippi</st1:State></st1:address>.&nbsp; Or, email me =
and I will
forward my copy.&nbsp; And by the way, I did not correct Dr. =
Hill&#8217;s
typos.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

The point of my email is this.&nbsp; I conclude that&nbsp; Steve
Wilkins&#8217; long and voluntary association with J. Michael Hill, =
indicates
his agreement with Michael Hill's writings. I wonder what, if anything, =
it
would take for him to identify someone or thing racist?&nbsp; I also =
wonder if
resigning his directorship means that he also resigned his =
membership?&nbsp;
Somehow, I doubt it.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>Rose Huskey<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:.5in'><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>PS&nbsp; I suppose anyone who wishes to read more about Doug's =
position
on the LOS organization&nbsp; &#8211; which he &#8220;mildly =
supports&#8221;
but did not join - could stop by the Christ Church office or email Doug
directly and ask for a copy.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C3DE75.F2144360--