[Vision2020] Christ Church & Tolerance: NOT (was Leaflets and Silence)
Saundra Lund
sslund@adelphia.net
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:40:53 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0171_01C3D6D7.BB34FAB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Visionaires:
=20
I found Ms. Huskey's "Leaflets and Silence" post to be very thought
provoking, and I look forward to reading more of what others think about =
the
issues she raised.
=20
Ms. Huskey wrote:
"More recently, I am told, he is actively engaged in courting senior
university and state officials in a sniveling bid for their support and
sympathy against genuinely trained academics."
=20
Can anyone please provide more information about this?
=20
We knew that Christ Church pastor Doug Wilson and Christ Church member/ =
New
St. Andrews school dean Roy Atwood were unhappy with Professors Quinlan =
&
Ramsey's scholarly piece "Southern Slavery As It Wasn't: Professional
Historians Respond to Neo-Confederate Misinformation." We knew this =
because
fellow Christ Church member Greg Dickison told us so on 12/31/2003:
"I know that two of my dear friends and brethren, Pastor Douglas Wilson =
of
Christ Church and Dean Roy Atwood of New St. Andrews College, have asked
that the U of I begin to extricate itself . . . by removing the Quinlan =
and
Ramsey hit piece from the ODHR's web site. I must respectfully =
disagree."
=20
What I don't understand -- and am asking here -- is why on earth fringe
fanatics like Wilson & Atwood think they have any business trying to =
tell
the U of I what they can and cannot have available via the Office of
Diversity and Human Rights' Web site?!?! What perceived rights do they
think they have to dictate what U of I professors research, think, and
write?
=20
Put another way, can you imagine the hue & cry from
CC/Logos/NSA/Credenda/Agenda/Cannon Press/ACCS et al if "outsiders" were
trying to tell them what & how to study, think, write, and publish, and =
what
they can/can't have on their Web sites?
=20
Please remind me again: who or what group is intolerant? Sounds to me =
like
the theonomists are the intolerant ones, a fact advertising paid for by
Christ Church unsuccessfully tried to convince us of otherwise.
=20
Ah . . . I see . . . all "outsiders" are to be tolerant of CC et al and
their desire for theonomy -- at least, their particular flavor -- for =
all,
but they have no intention of extending tolerance to the rest of us. =
So, in
their worldview, 'tolerance' is a one-way street . . . only to their
benefit.
=20
No thanks.
=20
=20
Saundra Lund
Moscow, ID
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to =
do
nothing.
-Edmund Burke=20
-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] =
On
Behalf Of DonaldH675@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:44 PM
To: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Leaflets and Silence
Visionaries:=20
=20
Tolerance is a two edged sword. We all enjoy and expect our first =
amendment
rights to be protected. I don't believe that many Vision 2020 readers =
wish
to abridge those rights, even if we are offended (or enraged) by the =
content
of some viewpoints. However, free speech is not the same thing as free
speech used to mask a religious agenda that includes the goal of =
destroying
our Constitution. Ironically, that is the ploy employed by theonomists.
=20
Hiding behind their constitutional right of free speech they promote a
philosophy that would effectively obliterate freedom of religion, =
freedom of
speech, gut our judicial system, and install a Big Brother in our living
rooms. Are theonomists entitled to their pipe dreams? Absolutely --
although under their rule I would not be entitled to mine. Gagged by =
the
fear of appearing intolerant some of us are, in effect, doing the
theonomists' work for them.=20
=20
Many V2020 contributors have suggested that those of us who speak out =
should
mind our own business, live and let live, and not push our world views =
on
others. Although my worldview may be offensive to some and celebrated =
by
others, let me assure you that I don't have a far-reaching plan, much =
less
willing disciples to inflict my worldview on the Palouse or anywhere =
else. I
hope our politically moderate and, particularly, our =
leaning-toward-the-left
contributors/sympathizers will reflect on the following compare and =
contrast
exercise.
=20
In 1999, Doug Wilson and Doug Jones dreamed up the notion of blanketing =
the
University of Idaho with their (yes, sigh, once again self-published)
leaflets entitled "Topless and Proud." Wilson describes this behavior =
as a
"prank." In actuality this puerile, adolescent attempt at humor was a
deliberate effort to mock and discredit the university and in the =
process
ridicule Moscow's progressive community. (See: Credenda Agenda, Vol. =
11,
Issue 3, column headed "Rattle and Hum"=20
< <http://www.credenda.org/issues/11-3meander.php>
http://www.credenda.org/issues/11-3meander.php> for Wilson's jocular
planning and execution of this "prank." Incidentally, you won't find =
any
explanation of the Beavis and Butthead breast-related humor that seems =
to be
a reoccurring theme in other "skylarking" events and writings. =20
=20
Doug Wilson endorsed and helped create a lie, dismissed the lie as
"high-jinks" and chortled over the resulting embarrassment to the
University. But ah, the wheel turns. More recently, I am told, he is
actively engaged in courting senior university and state officials in a
sniveling bid for their support and sympathy against genuinely trained
academics.
=20
In contrast, we have yet to have a gain a clear explanation from Doug =
Wilson
about the purported slanders, lies, and distortions in the leaflet that
accurately quoted Doug Wilson's and Steve Wilkins' historic =
interpretation
on slavery and race relations in the ante-bellum south. Where are the =
lies?
Where is the slander? Indeed, where are the historians? =20
=20
If any of you excuse your silence on the local theonomists by indulging =
in
the misguided notion that Doug Wilson and his comrades are just a little
local church desiring only to be left alone to worship God in their own
covenantal way, its time for you take your mind out of neutral and put =
it in
gear. You are engaged in wishful thinking and liberal lethargy. =
Christian
Reconstruction (aka) theonomy is a national movement. It has specific =
long
range goals. (Some of which you may have enjoyed reading about it in =
the
recent theomonic laws thread.) Doug Wilson's guests at the forthcoming
opinion conference, George Grant and Steve Wilkins, are enmeshed in the
Christian Reconstructionist and the neo-Confederate movements. Note
please: Doug denies that he is a card carrying Recon . It is perhaps =
just a
happy accident that his pronouncements and writings mirror the Recon =
agenda
and share religious doctrines. It is also the case that if information
chasms can't be leapt, a slippery little rhetorical device known as "the
covenantal lie" can bridge any awkward gaps. (For those of us who =
always
thought a lie was a lie, it's not. It's not really a lie if a "Saint" is
protecting or extending the covenant.)
=20
Those of you who mistakenly believe that by choosing silence you have =
staked
a claim on the moral high ground, lets be clear, you haven't. For those
delicate brothers and sisters among us who won't censure the local
theonomists because they wish to retain an unblemished reputations as
broadminded liberals, please reconsider your motives. Consider who and =
what
you are really defending.=20
=20
Rose Huskey
------=_NextPart_000_0171_01C3D6D7.BB34FAB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:st1 =
=3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
#ffffff">
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>Visionaires:</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>I found Ms. Huskey's "Leaflets and =
Silence"=20
post to be very thought provoking, and I look forward to reading more of =
what=20
others think about the issues she raised.</SPAN><SPAN=20
class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>Ms. Huskey wrote:</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>"More recently, I am told, he is =
actively=20
engaged in courting senior university and state officials in a sniveling =
bid for=20
their support and sympathy against genuinely trained =
academics."</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>Can anyone please provide more =
information=20
about this?</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004></SPAN><SPAN =
class=3D941291022-09012004>We=20
knew that Christ Church pastor Doug Wilson and Christ Church =
member/ New=20
St. Andrews school dean Roy Atwood were unhappy with Professors Quinlan =
&=20
Ramsey's scholarly piece "Southern Slavery As It Wasn't: =
Professional=20
Historians Respond to Neo-Confederate Misinformation." We =
knew this=20
because fellow Christ Church member Greg Dickison told us so on=20
12/31/2003:</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004>"<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I know that two of my dear =
friends=20
and brethren, Pastor Douglas Wilson of Christ Church and Dean Roy Atwood =
of New=20
St. Andrews College, have asked that the U of I begin to extricate =
itself . .=20
. by removing the Quinlan and Ramsey hit piece from the =
ODHR’s web site. I=20
must respectfully disagree."</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN=20
class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN=20
class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">What I don't understand -- =
and am=20
asking here -- is why on earth fringe fanatics like Wilson =
&=20
Atwood think they have any business trying to tell the U of I what they =
can and=20
cannot have available via the Office of Diversity and Human =
Rights' Web=20
site?!?! What perceived rights do they think they have to dictate =
what U=20
of I professors research, think, and write?</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Put another way, can you =
imagine the=20
hue & cry from CC/Logos/NSA/Credenda/Agenda/Cannon Press/ACCS et =
al if=20
"outsiders" were trying to tell them what & how to study, =
think, write,=20
and publish, and what they can/can't have on their Web=20
sites?</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Please remind me =
again: who or=20
what group is intolerant? Sounds to me like the theonomists are =
the=20
intolerant ones, a fact advertising paid for by Christ Church =
unsuccessfully=20
tried to convince us of otherwise.</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Ah . . . I see . . . all =
"outsiders"=20
are to be tolerant of CC et al and their desire for theonomy =
-- at=20
least, their particular flavor -- for all, but they have no =
intention of=20
extending tolerance to the rest of us. So, in their worldview, =
'tolerance'=20
is a one-way street . . . only to their benefit.</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">No =
thanks.</SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Saundra<SPAN class=3D941291022-09012004> Lund</SPAN><BR>Moscow, =
ID<BR><BR>The=20
only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do=20
nothing.<BR>-Edmund Burke </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr =
align=3Dleft><FONT=20
face=3DTahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] <B>On =
Behalf=20
Of </B>DonaldH675@aol.com<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 08, 2004 =
7:44=20
PM<BR><B>To:</B> vision2020@moscow.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] =
Leaflets and Silence<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Visionaries: </FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3></FONT> </P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Tolerance is a two edged sword.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes"> =20
</SPAN>We all enjoy and expect our first amendment rights to be=20
protected.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I don't =
believe that=20
many Vision 2020 readers wish to abridge those rights, even if we are =
offended=20
(or enraged) by the content of some viewpoints.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>However, free speech is not =
the same=20
thing as free speech used to mask a religious agenda that includes the =
goal of=20
destroying our Constitution.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> =20
</SPAN>Ironically, that is the ploy employed by =
theonomists.</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT =
size=3D3><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman">Hiding behind their constitutional right =
of free speech they promote a philosophy that would effectively=20
obliterate freedom of religion, freedom of speech, gut our judicial =
system,=20
and install a Big Brother in our living rooms.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Are theonomists entitled to =
their pipe=20
dreams?<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Absolutely -- =
although=20
under their rule I would not be entitled to mine.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Gagged by the fear of =
appearing=20
intolerant some of us are, in effect, doing the theonomists’ =
work for=20
them. </FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Many V2020 contributors have suggested that those of us who =
speak out=20
should mind our own business, live and let live, and not push our =
world views=20
on others.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Although my =
worldview=20
may be offensive to some and celebrated by others, let me assure you =
that I=20
don't have a far-reaching plan, much less willing disciples to inflict =
my=20
worldview on the Palouse or anywhere else. I hope our politically =
moderate=20
and, particularly, our leaning-toward-the-left =
contributors/sympathizers will=20
reflect on the following compare and contrast exercise.</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>In 1999, Doug Wilson and Doug Jones dreamed up the notion of =
blanketing=20
the <st1:place><st1:PlaceType>University</st1:PlaceType> of=20
<st1:PlaceName>Idaho</st1:PlaceName></st1:place> with their (yes, =
sigh, once=20
again self-published) leaflets entitled “Topless and =
Proud.” <SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes"> </SPAN><st1:City><st1:place>Wilson</st1:place></st1:City>=20
describes this behavior as a “prank.” In actuality this =
puerile, adolescent=20
attempt at humor was a deliberate effort to mock and discredit the =
university=20
and in the process ridicule=20
<st1:City><st1:place>Moscow's</st1:place></st1:City> progressive=20
community.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>(See: =20
<EM>Credenda Agenda</EM>, Vol. 11, Issue 3, column headed =
“Rattle and Hum”=20
</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3><</FONT><A=20
href=3D"http://www.credenda.org/issues/11-3meander.php"><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
=
size=3D3>http://www.credenda.org/issues/11-3meander.php</FONT></A><FONT=20
size=3D3><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">> for=20
<st1:City><st1:place>Wilson's</st1:place></st1:City> jocular planning =
and=20
execution of this “prank.” <SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Incidentally, you won't find =
any=20
explanation of the Beavis and Butthead breast-related humor that seems =
to be a=20
reoccurring theme in other “skylarking” events and =
writings. <SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Doug Wilson endorsed and helped create a lie, dismissed the =
lie as=20
“high-jinks” and chortled over the resulting embarrassment =
to the=20
University.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But ah, the =
wheel=20
turns. More recently, I am told, he is actively engaged in courting =
senior=20
university and state officials in a sniveling bid for their support =
and=20
sympathy against genuinely trained academics.</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>In contrast, we have yet to have a gain a clear explanation =
from Doug=20
Wilson about the purported<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> =20
</SPAN>slanders, lies, and distortions in the leaflet that accurately =
quoted=20
Doug Wilson's and Steve Wilkins’ historic interpretation on =
slavery and race=20
relations in the ante-bellum south.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes"> =20
</SPAN>Where are the lies?<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> =
</SPAN>Where=20
is the slander?<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> Indeed, where =
are the=20
</SPAN>historians?<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> <SPAN=20
class=3D941291022-09012004><FONT face=3DArial=20
=
size=3D2> </FONT></SPAN></SPAN></FONT>=
</P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>If any of you excuse your silence on the local =
theonomists by=20
indulging in the misguided notion that Doug Wilson and his comrades =
are just a=20
little local church desiring only to be left alone to worship God in =
their own=20
covenantal way, its time for you take your mind out of neutral and put =
it in=20
gear.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>You are engaged =
in wishful=20
thinking and liberal lethargy.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> =
</SPAN>Christian Reconstruction (aka) theonomy is a national =
movement.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It has specific long range =
goals.=20
<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>(Some of which you may =
have=20
enjoyed reading about it in the recent theomonic laws thread.)<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Doug Wilson’s guests =
at the=20
forthcoming opinion conference, George Grant and Steve Wilkins, are =
enmeshed=20
in the Christian Reconstructionist and the neo-Confederate movements. =
<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Note please: Doug =
denies that he=20
is a card carrying Recon .<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> =
</SPAN>It is=20
perhaps just a happy accident that his pronouncements and writings=20
mirror the Recon agenda and share religious doctrines.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It is also the case that if=20
information chasms can't be leapt, a slippery little rhetorical device =
known=20
as “the covenantal lie” can bridge any awkward gaps.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>(For those of us who always =
thought a=20
lie was a lie, it's not. It's not really a lie if a =
“Saint” is <SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>protecting or extending the=20
covenant.)</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Those of you who mistakenly believe that by choosing silence =
you have=20
staked a claim on the moral high ground, lets be clear, you =
haven't.<SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>For those delicate brothers =
and=20
sisters among us who won't censure the local theonomists because they =
wish to=20
retain an unblemished reputations as broadminded liberals, please =
reconsider=20
your motives. Consider who and what you are really defending. =
</FONT></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><o:p><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=3D"Times =
New Roman"=20
size=3D3>Rose Huskey</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0171_01C3D6D7.BB34FAB0--