[Vision2020] University Sale of Clark Fork Property
Jim Wallis
wallis@moscow.com
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:04:34 -0700
--Alt-Boundary-2035.4725074
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
Representative Trail,
Thank you for raising the issue of the sale of the Clark
Fork property on Vision2020. It is unfortunate that you
could only parrot interim President Michael's letter (full text
available http://www.uidaho.edu/openletter/), because that
letter raises more questions than it answers. Perhaps, as
an elected Representative, you could ask a few serious
questions about the decision-making process and the sale
itself.
Some sample questions:
Sales process: Michael says "the university decided to
accept an offer of $450,000 for the property," but people
make decisions. What person or persons made this
decision?
Retaining a valuable asset: An asset like this is not easily
replaced, and the University might have undertaken efforts
outside its current educational mission to preserve a
resource that could develop into a very important part of
the educational mission in the future. What measures were
taken to preserve it by promoting use by the Natural
Resources College itself? Were other state agencies, or
other government agencies, offered use of the facilities for
a fee? Were agencies or individuals offered lease
opportunities? Was active promotion of the site for non-
educational purposes considered?
Commitment to North Idaho: The original intent was to
offer courses and conduct research in North Idaho. Did
those responsible for the sale review the reasons for
original purchase decision? Has the University changed its
goals since that time? Has the University or the Natural
Resources College changed its commitment to North
Idaho? Does the sale indicate that the University expects
its programs in the North to shrink for the foreseeable
future, with no expansion on the horizon?
Establishing the value: There is much discussion about the
inability to establish the value of the property by
assessment. The only rational way to determine market
value is to market the property. Who at the University does
not understand this? While "more intensive marketing
plan" makes it sound like a major undertaking, wouldn't a
few newspaper ads have alerted most interested parties at
a trivial expense?
Policy for asset sales: Hand-waving about the profit
obscures the fact that the University failed to maximize its
return on the sale. If the true market value of the property
was a million dollars, then the University missed an
opportunity to improve its financial condition. It is
inconceivable that UI would purchase an item for a half-
million dollars without a competitive bid process. How is it
that there is no corresponding process for sales of major
assets? What specific administrative changes will be made
to correct this glaring absence of process?
Public trust: The failure to advertise the sale or inform the
community makes the sale look like an under-the-table
deal. Why were the administrators who made the decisions
not sensitive to the necessity of building public trust? What
measures are being taken to correct this insensitivity?
You finished your Vision2020 message with the quote
"That appearances are everything." This is patent
nonsense. By that measure, a Representative who posted
fluff about a serious issue to a discussion group would
have accomplished "everything." Far better that such a
Representative exert himself to learn a few facts that
would inform not only his constituents but also his own
legislative decision-making.
Jim Wallis
513 South Hayes
Moscow
--Alt-Boundary-2035.4725074
Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
<?xml version="1.0" ?><html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Representative Trail,</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Thank you for raising the issue of the sale of the Clark
Fork property on Vision2020. It is unfortunate that you
could only parrot interim President Michael's letter (full text
available http://www.uidaho.edu/openletter/), because that
letter raises more questions than it answers. Perhaps, as
an elected Representative, you could ask a few serious
questions about the decision-making process and the sale
itself.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Some sample questions: </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Sales process: Michael says  "the university decided to
accept an offer of $450,000 for the property,"  but people
make decisions. What person or persons made this
decision? </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Retaining a valuable asset: An asset like this is not easily
replaced, and the University might have undertaken efforts
outside its current educational mission to preserve a
resource that could develop into a very important part of
the educational mission in the future. What measures were
taken to preserve it by promoting use by the Natural
Resources College itself? Were other state agencies, or
other government agencies, offered use of the facilities for
a fee? Were agencies or individuals offered lease
opportunities?  Was active promotion of the site for non-
educational purposes considered? </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Commitment to North Idaho: The original intent was to
offer courses and conduct research in North Idaho. Did
those responsible for the sale review the reasons for
original purchase decision? Has the University changed its
goals since that time? Has the University or the Natural
Resources College changed its commitment to North
Idaho? Does the sale indicate that the University expects
its programs in the North to shrink for the foreseeable
future, with no expansion on the horizon? </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Establishing the value: There is much discussion about the
inability to establish the value of the property by
assessment. The only rational way to determine market
value is to market the property. Who at the University does
not understand this? While "more intensive marketing
plan" makes it sound like a major undertaking, wouldn't a
few newspaper ads have alerted most interested parties at
a trivial expense?</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Policy for asset sales: Hand-waving about the profit
obscures the fact that the University failed to maximize its
return on the sale. If the true market value of the property
was a million dollars, then the University missed an
opportunity to improve its financial condition. It is
inconceivable that UI would purchase an item for a half-
million dollars without a competitive bid process. How is it
that there is no corresponding process for sales of major
assets? What specific administrative changes will be made
to correct this glaring absence of process?  </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Public trust: The failure to advertise the sale or inform the
community makes the sale look like an under-the-table
deal. Why were the administrators who made the decisions
not sensitive to the necessity of building public trust? What
measures are being taken to correct this insensitivity? </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">You finished your Vision2020 message with the quote
"That appearances are everything." This is patent
nonsense. By that measure, a Representative who posted
fluff about a serious issue to a discussion group would
have accomplished "everything."  Far better that such a
Representative exert himself to learn a few facts that
would inform not only his constituents but also his own
legislative decision-making. </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><br/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Jim Wallis</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">513 South Hayes</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-size:12pt">Moscow</span></font></div>
<div align="left"></div>
</body>
</html>
--Alt-Boundary-2035.4725074--