[Vision2020] Re: Divisiveness

[Dale Courtney]

Andreas wrote:
> > When I asked for a reference to where that comes from, you cite
Wilson -- 
> > which didn't have any reference to North's quote.
>
> No. It didn't.
>
> I cited half of the disagreement; the other half doesn't, unfortunately
for my argument, belong to Gary North. I had thought that the point of
Doug's pro-life article had been in response to North's defense of Paul
Hill. I then realized that no such defense had taken place, and that, in
fact, North believes that the only murder of abortionists should be
judicial.
>
> In other words, I take full responsibility for being wrong.

OK, nothing wrong with being wrong. And there's much right about admitting
it.

I was just concerned that, given the quality of investigative reporting in
the Daily News, and given the fact that Bill London (and other reporters)
don't  care what the precise facts are in any matter, and given that Jim is
just concerned with people "feeling" bad about an issue, that we'd see this
in Saturday's Daily News as a headline piece. Then I'd be trying to get a
retraction from the Daily News for another 6 weeks, and...  Well, you get
the picture.

Best,
Dale