[Vision2020] correction: liquor insurance at 1912 bldg

[Mike Curley]

I have been advised that I was wrong in a prior post.  I 
apologize.  

The proposal to require liquor caterers at the 1912 Bldg to 
provide $1M insurance coverage naming the city as an 
additional insured is NOT a proposed ordinance, but a 
proposed policy change.  I believe the effect is the same, 
but the policy would not show up in the city's ordinances.

Jack Hill:  As President of City Council, could you inquire 
into having city policies posted on the website?  They have 
the same effect as the law, but are impossible to find.  
Staff has to interpret them and the citizens have little 
opportunity to review and prepare for them in advance.  If 
we want to be a business friendly town as council has 
stated, it seems that a business should be able to see all 
the rules at one time.  Thank you for your consideration.

Mike Curley