[Vision2020] Homicidal bombers

[thansen@moscow.com]

Don Coombs stated:

". . . you seem to believe that all things bad must also be cowardly."

How did you come up with that evaluation?  Not all things bad are cowardly just 
like not all things cowardly are bad.  My statement is simple.  A true believer 
of his/her convictions will stand up to his/her enemies.  Attacking the 
defenseless is, without any doubt, absolute cowardice.

Mr. Coombs continues to state:

"As for Mr. Westburg: If we are going to elect someone from Texas, they are 
going to talk like Texans. (Do you suppose the Supreme Court took this into 
account when they finished up (or finished off) the election? Of course not; 
the Court just wanted a president who could hold his own in a new-ku-ler 
world.)"

Are you saying that the Supreme Court took it upon themselves to decide who the 
next President of the United States was to be?  That the Supreme Court ignored 
the question placed before it (that the election in Florida was/was not 
conducted legally and fairly)?  That the Supreme Court "appointed" the 
President of the United States without any concern for the desires "of the 
governed"?

Tom Hansen
Moscow,
Idaho

---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.net/