[Vision2020] uranium denial--GUTLESS DEMOS?

[Mike Curley]

Perhaps there is an issue about who controls Congress 
and, thus, how much control the impeachment-oriented 
have.  Let's not get all dewy-eyed about either party being 
on the ethical high ground, at the national level especially, 
and even more particularly when it comes to 
impeachment.


On 14 Jul 03, at 17:43, Tim Lohrmann wrote:

From:           	Tim Lohrmann <timlohr@yahoo.com>
Subject:        	RE: [Vision2020] uranium denial--GUTLESS DEMOS?
To:             	Thomas Hansen <tomh@FNA.fsn.uidaho.edu>
Copies to:      	vision2020@moscow.com
Date sent:      	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:43:47 -0700 (PDT)

> Visionaries,
>    Tom makes an interesting point.
>    Why DOESN'T the Democrat party launch and
> impeachment effort if they think it's warranted?
>    When Clinton committed perjury by lying under oath
> (in a suit alleging what one would think would be a
> Democrat sacred cow--sexual harassment,) the GOP did
> so. And love'em or hate'em they did so at quite a lot
> of personal political risk to themselves. Witness the
> fact that the Demos gained ground in the next mid-term
> elections when they controlled the White House--an
> occurence that had rarely happened before then. 
>   So the question is, why DON'T the Demos ask for
> impeachment?
>   I would diagnose a severe case of yellow-bellied
> political gutlessness.
>   In other words they're too afraid. Afraid that if
> they do so and don't, or only partially succeed, it
> will backfire on them in the next elections due to
> popular resentment. A pretty fair fear to have too. I
> mean it happened before right?
>    TL
> 
> 
> --- Thomas Hansen <tomh@FNA.fsn.uidaho.edu> wrote:
> > Good question, Mr. Ramalimgam.  I suppose that if
> > this were a Democratic
> > administration, we would see a major drive for
> > impeachment in both the House
> > and the Senate.
> >  
> > Tom Hansen
> > Moscow, Idaho
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sunil Ramalingam
> > [mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:21 PM
> > To: vision2020@moscow.com
> > Subject: [Vision2020] uranium denial
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Here's a link to an article about the
> > Administration's denials about the
> > uranium lie in the State of the Union address. What
> > would Rush Limbaugh have
> > to say if the President's name was Bill Clinton? 
> > 
> >  <http://truthout.org/docs_03/071403A.shtml>
> > http://truthout.org/docs_03/071403A.shtml
> > 
> > Sunil Ramalingam
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > The new MSN 8: <http://g.msn.com/8HMSENUS/2737??PS=>
> >  smart spam protection
> > and 2 months FREE*
> >
> _____________________________________________________
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities
> > of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> >
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
> 
> _____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>           mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ