[Vision2020] re: liquor liability

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:39:45 -0800

--------------29802159C03B4E3B08C28272
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

D-
well, that was a pretty wild interpretation of what I wrote.
I noted what I consider the differences between a public space (fully
accessible, smokefree, family friendly) and a nightclub.
I think there are markets for both kinds of spaces.
As part of the city's role in preserving historical buildings--as well
as supporting community activities, the arts, and civic interaction--I
think it's a good idea to support projects like the 1912 Building.
BL

Dale Courtney wrote:

>  Bill,Let me get this right. There's no establishment in town that
> provides the services that you are looking for; so you think that the
> city should fund a building where you can afford to have your
> parties? Please let me know if I'm not understanding you
> correctly. Dale
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>      From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com
>      [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] On Behalf Of Bill
>      London
>      Sent: Wednesday, 12 February, 2003 09:29
>      To: Cjsnightclub@aol.com
>      Cc: vision2020@moscow.com
>      Subject: Re: [Vision2020] re: liquor liability
>
>      I believe that a night club like CJ's and the 1912 Building
>      are not competitors.  Their target markets are different.
>      CJ's does not offer a venue truly open to all with
>      wheelchair access and smoke-free environment.
>      BL
>
>      Cjsnightclub@aol.com wrote:
>
>     > Mike - how do you see the city "promoting local business"
>     > in reference to the advertising of the 1912 building? If
>     > you think it is because the 1912 building is allowing
>     > persons who hold liquor licenses to cater them to the 1912
>     > building, you are mistaken. That is not a good deal. Here
>     > is how I view it. The city is taking events that normally
>     > would be held in the private sector and robbing revenues
>     > away from the tax paying entities and throwing a small
>     > bone to the few that probably don't have liquor liability
>     > insurance to cater their license to the 1912 building. It
>     > is not helping business in the private sector it is
>     > stealing business from the tax paying enterprises. In fact
>     > they use our tax money to advertise against us. Not to
>     > help us. Just my opinion.
>

--------------29802159C03B4E3B08C28272
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
D-
 well, that was a pretty wild interpretation of what I wrote.
 I noted what I consider the differences between a public space (fully
accessible, smokefree, family friendly) and a nightclub.
 I think there are markets for both kinds of spaces.
 As part of the city's role in preserving historical buildings--as well
as supporting community activities, the arts, and civic interaction--I
think it's a good idea to support projects like the 1912 Building.
 BL
Dale Courtney wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;Bill,Let
me get this right. There's no establishment in town that provides the services
that you are looking for; so you think that the city should fund a building
where you can afford to have your parties?&nbsp;Please
let me know if I'm not understanding you correctly.&nbsp;Dale
<blockquote dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" lang="en-us" dir="ltr">-----Original
Message-----
 From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com
[<A HREF="mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com">mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com</A>] On Behalf Of Bill London
 Sent: Wednesday, 12 February,
2003 09:29
 To: Cjsnightclub@aol.com
 Cc: vision2020@moscow.com
 Subject: Re: [Vision2020]
re: liquor liability
 &nbsp;</div>
I believe that a night club like CJ's and the 1912 Building are not competitors.&nbsp;
Their target markets are different.
 CJ's does not offer a venue truly open to all with wheelchair access
and smoke-free environment.
 BL
Cjsnightclub@aol.com wrote:
<blockquote TYPE="CITE">Mike - how do
you see the city "promoting local business" in reference to the advertising
of the 1912 building? If you think it is because the 1912 building is allowing
persons who hold liquor licenses to cater them to the 1912 building, you
are mistaken. That is not a good deal. Here is how I view it. The city
is taking events that normally would be held in the private sector and
robbing revenues away from the tax paying entities and throwing a small
bone to the few that probably don't have liquor liability insurance to
cater their license to the 1912 building. It is not helping business in
the private sector it is stealing business from the tax paying enterprises.
In fact they use our tax money to advertise against us. Not to help us.
Just my opinion.</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</html>

--------------29802159C03B4E3B08C28272--