[Vision2020] re: liquor liability

[jsullivan@moscow.com]

A few years ago one of my sons got married. At that time the families shopped 
around town for a place to hold the reception. All were either VERY expensive, 
or required you to use their food, which made it even more expensive.

Not all people is this community are financially able to afford CJ's, Best 
Western or a number of other places that offer what the 1912 building does. 

This taxpayer is thankful there is a lovely public building which is owned by 
us, that we can use at a reasonable price, and bring our own food.

Have a pleasant evening everyone!

Janesta Sullivan


> Mike - how do you see the city "promoting local business" in reference to 
the 
> advertising of the 1912 building? If you think it is because the 1912 
> building is allowing persons who hold liquor licenses to cater them to the 
> 1912 building, you are mistaken. That is not a good deal. Here is how I view 
> it. The city is taking events that normally would be held in the private 
> sector and robbing revenues away from the tax paying entities and throwing a 
> small bone to the few that probably don't have liquor liability insurance to 
> cater their license to the 1912 building. It is not helping business in the 
> private sector it is stealing business from the tax paying enterprises. In 
> fact they use our tax money to advertise against us. Not to help us. Just my 
> opinion.
> 


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.net/