[Vision2020] taxation

Dale Courtney dmcourtn@moscow.com
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:55:32 -0800


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3C89B.A8796540
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sunil raises a great point!
 
>From a Libertarian perspective, the only difference between the Democrats
and the Republicans are how fast they want to drive us over the cliff -- and
how soon we reach that point. 
 
Both are "way left" of being fiscal conservatives. 

Bush 43, while saying he is a fiscal conservative is anything but. 
 
Best,
Dale
 



  _____  

From: vision2020-admin@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] On
Behalf Of Sunil Ramalingam
Sent: Monday, 22 December, 2003 14:30
To: dmcourtn@moscow.com; vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] taxation



Dale,

Are the people spending $4 billion a month on the war in Iraq leftists or
liberals?  Is it possible that there are people wearing other labels that
are busy increasing our national deficit?

Sunil



>From: "Dale Courtney" 
>To: 
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] taxation 
>Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:05:53 -0800 
> 
>Phil, 
> 
>As for TANSTAAFL -- there's too much to say. First, the leftists want to 
>continue to increase the taxation burden that our children will bear. They 
>simultaneously ignore that there is a decreasing population base to support

>those taxes. 
> 
>Here is the tax burden on our children just for Social Security: 
> 
>SSA Workers per Beneficiary 
> 
>As you can see, we currently have ~3.3 workers supporting every SSA 
>beneficiary. 
> 
>Because of the decreasing birth rate in the USA, the increasing life 
>expectancy, and the large number of Baby Boomers who are retiring, we will 
>be to the point where over 50% of our kids' pay will go to support just SSA

>benefits by ~2045. 
> 
>No, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch -- just shifting the cost
onto 
>someone else. 
> 
>The liberals have only a couple choices -- start having more children (will

>never happen), cut benefits (doubtful), live with an 85% tax burden, or 
>privatize Social Security. 
> 
>I'd like to see some out-of-the-box thinking from the Left on this one. 
> 
>Best, 
>Dale 
> 



------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3C89B.A8796540
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2>Sunil raises a great point!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2>From a Libertarian perspective, the only =
difference between=20
the Democrats and the Republicans are how fast they want to drive us =
over the=20
cliff -- and how soon we reach that point. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2>Both are "way left" of being fiscal =
conservatives.=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV><SPAN class=3D705125322-22122003><FONT face=3DArial=20
color=3D#800000 size=3D2>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><BR>Bush 43, while <U>saying</U> he is a =
fiscal=20
conservative is anything but. </DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft></FONT></SPAN><FONT color=3D#800000><FONT =
size=3D2><FONT=20
face=3DArial>Best,</FONT><BR></FONT><FONT face=3D"Vladimir Script"=20
size=3D5>Dale</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000 =
size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><FONT=20
face=3D"Vladimir Script" color=3D#800000 size=3D5></FONT><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #800000 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>
  <HR tabIndex=3D-1>
  <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> vision2020-admin@moscow.com=20
  [mailto:vision2020-admin@moscow.com] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Sunil=20
  Ramalingam<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, 22 December, 2003 =
14:30<BR><B>To:</B>=20
  dmcourtn@moscow.com; vision2020@moscow.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: =
[Vision2020]=20
  taxation<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV class=3DRTE>
  <P>Dale,</P>
  <P>Are the people spending $4 billion a month on the war in Iraq =
leftists or=20
  liberals?&nbsp; Is it possible that there are people wearing other =
labels that=20
  are busy increasing our national deficit?</P>
  <P>Sunil<BR><BR></P></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;From: "Dale Courtney" <DMCOURTN@MOSCOW.COM>
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;To: <VISION2020@MOSCOW.COM>
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: RE: [Vision2020] taxation=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:05:53 -0800=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Phil,=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;As for TANSTAAFL -- there's too much to say. First, the =

  leftists want to=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;continue to increase the taxation burden that our =
children will=20
  bear. They=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;simultaneously ignore that there is a decreasing =
population=20
  base to support=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;those taxes.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Here is the tax burden on our children just for Social=20
  Security:=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;SSA Workers per Beneficiary=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;As you can see, we currently have ~3.3 workers =
supporting every=20
  SSA=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;beneficiary.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Because of the decreasing birth rate in the USA, the =
increasing=20
  life=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;expectancy, and the large number of Baby Boomers who =
are=20
  retiring, we will=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;be to the point where over 50% of our kids' pay will go =
to=20
  support just SSA=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;benefits by ~2045.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;No, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch -- just =
shifting=20
  the cost onto=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;someone else.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;The liberals have only a couple choices -- start having =
more=20
  children (will=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;never happen), cut benefits (doubtful), live with an =
85% tax=20
  burden, or=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;privatize Social Security.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;I'd like to see some out-of-the-box thinking from the =
Left on=20
  this one.=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Best,=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;Dale=20
  <DIV></DIV>&gt;=20
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#800000=20
size=3D2></FONT></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3C89B.A8796540--