[Vision2020] Logos School's all-male board

[Doug Jones]

Melynda wrote:

> Why, Doug (Jones), you puzzle me.  Those binary oppositions weren't
mine,
> but Chesterton's, as cited approvingly by Doug (Wilson):  I presumed
that he
> agreed with Chesterton, and consequently with the metaphoric divisions
> Chesterton established.

There's the hitch. Metaphoric divisions are rarely binary oppositions.
And not all apparent binary oppositions are negations. It's a
trinitarian thing, though (e.g., The Son is not the Father, and yet the
Son is not any less than the Father).

>
> Maybe I'm missing something.
> 

Chesterton is a great place to start in trying to understand many of the
culture clashes on Vision 2020 and in the future of Moscow. He's a
brilliant Roman Catholic author who has made deep impressions on many of
us local Protestants. New St. Andrews even offers elective courses on
Chesterton. I recommend the following two books to start with:


G.K. Chesterton, *Orthodoxy*
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0898705525/qid=1049917250/sr=2-1/
ref=sr_2_1/102-6129711-3847344


G.K. Chesterton, *Brave New Family*
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/089870314X/qid=1049917114/
sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-6129711-3847344?v=glance&s=books&n=507846


Doug Jones

P.S. If Greg Burton only had the least clue about how far off his last
post was. . .