[RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

Greg Hass GregH at FAR.org
Tue Dec 22 11:15:36 PST 2009


Harry, I would argue that disabling an access gate card would fall
within the umbrella of prohibited practices under 83.62 (2), but of
course this brings me back to the original conundrum of whether or not a
condo association can lawfully engage in what would otherwise be
considered "prohibited practices" for a landlord under the LL/T statute.

 

Tequisha, I also had a call recently where a condo association, as part
of its T approval process, was requiring the T to sign something
purportedly making the T personally liable to the association for unpaid
assessments in the event the LL doesn't pay the assessments.  The
question posed to me was If a "Contract to Lease" (an FAR form) that's
already been signed by prospective LL and prospective T says it's
contingent on Association approval and approval is subsequently denied
based on prospective T's refusal to sign a document that is arguably
unreasonable, does prospective T get his money back?  The FAR Contract
to Lease provides that prospective T will "make all reasonable
efforts...to obtain Association approval..."   My opinion FWIW was that
it would be reasonable for a prospective T to balk at signing such a
lease addendum mandated by the association.

 

Regards,

Greg   

 

 

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
harry at evict.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:54 PM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

I have never seen a condo association change locks but have seen them
deny access by disabling an access gate card.

 

Harry

 

LAW OFFICES OF 
HEIST, WEISSE & DAVIS, P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.com <http://www.evict.com/>  
Email: harry at evict.com

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND
INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR
DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

 

 

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Tequisha
Myles
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:43 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

We are starting to see many Condo Associations in Palm Beach County that
require the Tenant to sign lease addendums that force a tenant to pay
rent to the Association directly if the landlord fails to pay his or her
maintenance fees.  Also these lease addendums state that the Association
is somehow authorized to evict the tenant for non-payment.  So a
prohibited practices amendment to include any type of community
association may be worth exploring...

 

Tequisha Y. Myles, Esq.

Fair Housing and Elder Law Projects

Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County

423 Fern Street, Suite 200

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

(561) 655-8944 Ext. 296

(561) 655-5269 Fax

tmyles at legalaidpbc.org <BLOCKED::BLOCKED::mailto:tmyles at legalaidpbc.org>


 

 

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Eric A.
Jacobs
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:01 PM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

While that's true, I think the Association would have clear exposure for
trespass and other claims.  It would in my view make no sense to amend
the statute since the Association is not in any case the Tenant's
Landlord.  At best, I think the Association might be able to bring an
action for Ejectment if the association docs permit.  

 

Our firm and our family supports the wonderful work of 

Mount Sinai Medical Center and its Neonatal ICU.  

Please check out our Share page at

 http://www.msmcfoundation.org/EricandNicoleJacobs
<http://www.msmcfoundation.org/EricandNicoleJacobs> 

 

          

 

 

 

Eric Jacobs, J.D., M.B.A.
Managing Partner
Board Certified - Real Estate

 

eric at jacobsoffir.com <mailto:eric at jacobsoffir.com> 
1911 Harrison Street
Hollywood, Florida 33020
<http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmap&addr=1911+Harrison+Street&csz
=Hollywood%2C+Florida+33020&country=us> 

Tel: 954-929-0679
<http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?src=jj_signature&To=954-929-0679&Ema
il=ericj at jerichotitle.com> 
fax: 954-929-0926
mobile: 954-243-3100
<http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?src=jj_signature&To=954-243-3100&Ema
il=ericj at jerichotitle.com> 

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information contained in this electronic
communication, including any and all attachments and enclosures, may be
privileged and is strictly confidential, intended solely for the use of
the person(s) identified above to receive this communication. If you are
not the person(s) identified above to receive this communication, you
are hereby notified that you may not disclose, print, copy, disseminate,
or otherwise use the information contained herein. If you are an
employee or agent of the person(s) identified above to receive this
communication and, as such, you have been authorized to deliver this
communication to such person(s), you may disclose, print, copy,
disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained in this
communication solely for the purpose of such delivery. Unauthorized
interception and/or use of this communication are/is strictly prohibited
and may be punishable by law. If you have received this communication in
error, please reply and notify the sender (only) of that fact and delete
the communication, including any and all attachments and enclosures,
from your computer or other electronic device on which you may have
received this communication.

 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Greg Hass
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 12:42 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

Thanks Harry.  I agree with you that the proper procedure is for the LL
to file for eviction.   However, I'm starting to think that perhaps
83.67 needs to be amended to clarify that not only the Landlord, but
also his/her association is prohibited from engaging in any of the
so-called prohibited practices / self-help eviction techniques.  As it
stands now, a literal reading of the statute would suggest it doesn't
directly apply to associations.

 

Regards,

Greg 

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
harry at evict.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 12:28 PM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

The landlord needs to file an eviction. No lockout is legal. The tenant
is a holdover if the tenancy was properly terminated by the lease or by
proper notice, if necessary, from the landlord. The association has no
right to deny the tenant access but may have a right to file an eviction
on behalf of the unit owner if stated in the docs. The landlord would be
wise to have an attorney file the eviction as it will be less complex
and cheaper. 

 

Harry Heist

 

LAW OFFICES OF 
HEIST, WEISSE & DAVIS, P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.com <http://www.evict.com/>  
Email: harry at evict.com

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND
INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR
DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

 

 

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Greg Hass
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 12:17 PM
To: landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Condo changing locks on Tenants

 

Curious to hear the committee members' thoughts on the question I got
today.  Apparently a T of a condo unit is holding over beyond the
termination date of their written lease with LL.  LL wants them out and
notifies their condo association that T is a squatter.  Association then
sends letter to T saying the association will be changing the locks
because their rules require that there must be a valid/current written
lease on file with the association and there no longer is a current
lease.

 

The question I have is can a condo association lawfully engage in what
would be considered "prohibited practices" for a landlord under the LL/T
statute?

 

Here are some of the statutes that I think may come into play:

 

Section 83.67 (2) provides that a "...a landlord of any dwelling
unit...shall not prevent the tenant from gaining reasonable access to
the dwelling unit by any means, including, but not limited to, changing
the locks..."

 

Section 718.303 provides that Tenants are governed by the condo docs and
they are deemed incorporated into any lease.

 

However, Section 83.17 provides that any provision in a rental agreement
is void and unenforceable to the extent that it purports to waive or
preclude the rights, remedies, or requirements set forth in this part,
etc.

 

Under 83.58 the remedy for a tenant holding over is for the Landlord to
file for an eviction.

 

Section 718.303 also provides that an association or unit owner may file
an action for "damages" or "injunctive relief" against a tenant.

 

718.106 provides that "...when a unit is leased, a tenant shall have all
use rights in the association property and those common elements
otherwise readily available for use generally by unit owners..."

 

Does the fact that 718.303 provides for the filing of actions for
damages and injunctive relief against Tenants imply that other actions
(such as changing locks, cutting off electricity, etc) would be
prohibited?  Would it be possible to argue that the LL should be held
responsible for the actions of his association (of which the LL is a
member) and therefore claim damages for prohibited practices under
83.67(6)?  Note that 83.67 (1) uses the phrase "...shall not cause,
directly or indirectly, ..."  Is the LL "indirectly" engaging in
prohibited practices where he stands by and perhaps even encourages his
association to engage in what would be prohibited practices if the LL
were to take the action directly?

 

Thanks for your comments in advance.

 

Regards,

Greg

 

Greg Hass, Senior Counsel

Office of Law & Policy

Florida REALTORS(r)

7025 Augusta National Drive

Orlando, FL  32872-5025

Ph:  (407) 438-1400

GregH at FAR.org <mailto:GregH at FAR.org> 

 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER:  The information transmitted is intended solely for
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer.

 

Florida Realtors(r)
A brand new real estate organization with 93 years of experience!
http://www.floridarealtors.org <http://www.floridarealtors.org> 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20091222/a89d7007/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3644 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20091222/a89d7007/attachment-0002.jpe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3508 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20091222/a89d7007/attachment-0003.jpe 


More information about the landten mailing list