[RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Quick Lien Question

Tue Nov 8 14:06:24 PST 2011

Send a request for sworn statement and do an order to show cause action under 713.21.  This is probably the quickest way to resolve the issue.

  Raymond L. Robinson, Esq.

  Cell: (305) 632-4384

  http://www.rrobinsonlaw.com/ <http://www.rrobinsonlaw.com/>   

* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, destroy all copies of the original message, and do not disseminate it further. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please advise the sender immediately.

Connect with Robinson & Associates, P.A.

       <http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/pages/Coral-Gables-FL/Robinson-Associates-PA/113822315326716?ref=sgm&ajaxpipe=1&__a=4>     <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/raymond-robinson/26/35b/a09> 

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Belcastro
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 4:01 PM
To: Constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Quick Lien Question

 Hi folks,

 I have the GC.  One of our subs who was fired long ago, recorded a lien on October 20, which reflected a date of last work of July 4 - - more than 90 days.  When he started threatening to file suit, we advised him that the lien is invalid because it was not timely file.  YESTERDAY (November 7), he recorded a new claim of lien which reflects a new date of last work of August 10, so on its face, it's timely.  Is anyone aware of authority that basically invalidates this new lien automatically since it's pretty clearly not in good faith in light of the previously recorded lien?

My client is just trying to keep the owner stable at this point.  Any help is appreciated.  Thanks.  

Matthew Belcastro
Attorney at Law
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.
1715 Monroe Street
P.O. Box 280
Fort Myers, FL  33902
Direct Dial:  239.344.1205
Direct Fax: 239.344.1524
Matthew.Belcastro at henlaw.com
www.henlaw.com

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT

Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.

The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our e-mail administrator directly, please send an e-mail to administrator at henlaw.com <mailto:administrator at henlaw.com> 

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:  Pursuant to Treasury Department Circular 230, this is to advise you unless we otherwise expressly state in writing, e-mail communications, including all attachments,  from this firm are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties.  If you wish to engage this firm to provide formal written advice as to federal or state tax issues, please contact the sender.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11677 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3775 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5881 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6487 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4339 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1731 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1689 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7693 bytes
Desc: image008.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3446 bytes
Desc: image009.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111108/cd446cf9/image009.jpg>